From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp03.smtpout.orange.fr ([80.12.242.125] helo=smtp.smtpout.orange.fr) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fmOS1-0002YQ-Fs for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2018 19:12:27 +0000 From: Robert Jarzmik To: Boris Brezillon , Mike Dunn Cc: Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Richard Weinberger , Miquel Raynal , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Marek Vasut , Sergey Larin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mtd: rawnand: Remove docg4 References: <20180804205923.25298-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2018 21:12:11 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20180804205923.25298-1-boris.brezillon@bootlin.com> (Boris Brezillon's message of "Sat, 4 Aug 2018 22:59:20 +0200") Message-ID: <87effc1vck.fsf@belgarion.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Boris Brezillon writes: > The diskonchip G4 driver does not fit very well in the raw/parallel > NAND framework simply because such chips have an internal controller > translating DoC-specific commands into NAND ones. > > Keeping such a driver in the raw NAND framework is a real burden for > NAND maintainers. Hi Boris, I understand the "burden" part, yet we all have our burdens as old code maintainers. But still, you're going to remove a working driver from one of my platforms. This is not something I'm really happy about. At least, I'd like to hear from Mike that he doesn't use this anymore. Cheers. -- Robert