public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	zajec5@gmail.com, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: Handle re-linking of inodes correctly while recovery
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 02:18:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ftwpqffq.fsf@husum.klickitat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181028214407.20965-1-richard@nod.at> (Richard Weinberger's message of "Sun, 28 Oct 2018 22:44:07 +0100")


UBIFS's recovery code strictly assumes that a deleted inode will never
come back, therefore it removes all data which belongs to that inode
as soon it faces an inode with link count 0 in the replay list.
Before O_TMPFILE this assumption was perfectly fine. With O_TMPFILE
it can lead to data loss upon a power-cut.

Consider a journal with entries like:
0: inode X (nlink = 0) /* O_TMPFILE was created */
1: data for inode X /* Someone writes to the temp file */
2: inode X (nlink = 0) /* inode was changed, xattr, chmod, … */
3: inode X (nlink = 1) /* inode was re-linked via linkat() */

Upon replay of entry #2 UBIFS will drop all data that belongs to inode X,
this will lead to an empty file after mounting.

As solution for this problem, scan the replay list for a re-link entry
before dropping data.

Fixes: 474b93704f32 ("ubifs: Implement O_TMPFILE")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
Reported-by: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Tested-by: Russell Senior <russell@personaltelco.net>
---
Russel, Rafał,

please give this patch another testing.
I'll also run it on different test systems before merging.

Thanks,
//richard
---
 fs/ubifs/replay.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/replay.c b/fs/ubifs/replay.c
index 4844538eb926..65a780685b82 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/replay.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/replay.c
@@ -209,6 +209,34 @@ static int trun_remove_range(struct ubifs_info *c, struct replay_entry *r)
 	return ubifs_tnc_remove_range(c, &min_key, &max_key);
 }
 
+/**
+ * inode_relinked - check whether inode in question will be re-linked.
+ * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
+ * @rino: replay entry to test
+ *
+ * O_TMPFILE files can be re-linked, this means link count goes from 0 to 1.
+ * This case needs special care, otherwise all references to the inode will
+ * be removed upon the first replay entry of an inode with link count 0
+ * is found.
+ */
+static bool inode_relinked(struct ubifs_info *c, struct replay_entry *rino)
+{
+	struct replay_entry *r = rino;
+
+	ubifs_assert(c, rino->deletion);
+	ubifs_assert(c, key_type(c, &rino->key) == UBIFS_INO_KEY);
+
+	list_for_each_entry_from(r, &c->replay_list, list) {
+		if (key_inum(c, &r->key) == key_inum(c, &rino->key) &&
+		    r->deletion == 0) {
+			ubifs_assert(c, r->sqnum > rino->sqnum);
+			return true;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return false;
+}
+
 /**
  * apply_replay_entry - apply a replay entry to the TNC.
  * @c: UBIFS file-system description object
@@ -236,6 +264,11 @@ static int apply_replay_entry(struct ubifs_info *c, struct replay_entry *r)
 			{
 				ino_t inum = key_inum(c, &r->key);
 
+				if (inode_relinked(c, r)) {
+					err = 0;
+					break;
+				}
+
 				err = ubifs_tnc_remove_ino(c, inum);
 				break;
 			}
-- 
2.19.1



-- 
Russell Senior, President
russell@personaltelco.net

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-29  9:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-28 21:44 [PATCH] ubifs: Handle re-linking of inodes correctly while recovery Richard Weinberger
2018-10-29  9:18 ` Russell Senior [this message]
2018-11-01  8:55 ` Rafał Miłecki
2018-11-01  9:13   ` Richard Weinberger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87ftwpqffq.fsf@husum.klickitat.com \
    --to=russell@personaltelco.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=zajec5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox