Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption

From: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
To: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	 Md Sadre Alam <quic_mdalam@quicinc.com>,
	 Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>,
	 Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@quicinc.com>,
	 Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	 linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] spi: spi-qpic-snand: avoid memory corruption
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 10:13:39 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r00b23ik.fsf@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250525-qpic-snand-avoid-mem-corruption-v1-0-5fe528def7fb@gmail.com> (Gabor Juhos's message of "Sun, 25 May 2025 19:05:34 +0200")

Hi Gabor,

On 25/05/2025 at 19:05:34 +02, Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com> wrote:

> The 'spi-qpic-nand' driver may cause memory corruption under some
> circumstances. The first patch in the series changes the driver to
> avoid that, whereas the second adds some sanity checks to the common
> QPIC code in order to make detecting such errors easier in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gabor Juhos <j4g8y7@gmail.com>
> ---
> Gabor Juhos (2):
>       spi: spi-qpic-snand: reallocate BAM transactions
>       mtd: nand: qpic_common: prevent out of bounds access of BAM
> arrays

Are these two paches related somehow? Or can we apply them in
two different trees? If yes, please send the patches separately, which
eases our work.

Thanks,
Miquèl

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/