From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-bw0-f218.google.com ([209.85.218.218]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1NuKBH-0008Ba-IP for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:35:12 +0000 Received: by bwz10 with SMTP id 10so8417429bwz.2 for ; Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Peter Korsgaard From: Peter Korsgaard To: Phillip Lougher Subject: Re: RFC: direct MTD support for SquashFS References: <87vdcwv139.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> <87ljdsibqe.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> <87r5nhziss.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> <8739zqpxxw.fsf@tac.ki.iif.hu> <4BA9A1BB.4000105@lougher.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:35:01 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4BA9A1BB.4000105@lougher.demon.co.uk> (Phillip Lougher's message of "Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:23:07 +0000") Message-ID: <87y6hii5wq.fsf@macbook.be.48ers.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Phillip Lougher , linux-embedded@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Ferenc Wagner List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >>>>> "Phillip" == Phillip Lougher writes: Hi, Phillip> BTW as a comparison, I have added MTD support to Squashfs Phillip> twice in the past, *with* bad block support. The latest has a Phillip> diff patch of ~500 lines, with far less complexity and code Phillip> changes necessary. Could we merge that then please? Again, what kind of size reduction can we expect from getting rid of the block layer? -- Bye, Peter Korsgaard