From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm0-x244.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::244]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cR1p5-00069T-Kl for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 19:11:09 +0000 Received: by mail-wm0-x244.google.com with SMTP id l2so32050482wml.2 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2017 11:10:46 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] mtd: nand: raw: prefix conflicting names with nandc instead of nand To: Boris Brezillon , Richard Weinberger , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Peter Pan References: <1479732328-18363-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <1479732328-18363-5-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Cc: David Woodhouse , Brian Norris , Cyrille Pitchen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ezequiel Garcia , Kelvin Cheung From: Marek Vasut Message-ID: <8fb86bb7-425a-3897-2d1d-7277e94918ec@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:08:23 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1479732328-18363-5-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 11/21/2016 01:45 PM, Boris Brezillon wrote: > Some raw NAND function names conflict with names defined in nand.h. > Prefix all those functions with nandc (for nand chip) instead of nand so > we can include nand.h from rawnand.h > > Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon Nit, nand and nandc is quite confusing, why not call it nand_chip in full? -- Best regards, Marek Vasut