From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 166VLf-0001Nb-00 for ; Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:15:23 +0000 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <3BFBDB54.C02EBE28@sasken.com> References: <3BFBDB54.C02EBE28@sasken.com> To: Ashok M Padmanaban Cc: MTD for Linux , JFFS mailing list Subject: Re: Flash Partitons Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 11:25:51 +0000 Message-ID: <9111.1006341951@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: ashokmp@sasken.com said: > But having the config files and user data in the same partition > .......will it be safe? Like while manipulating the user data, is > there any chance that config files may be corrupted...while GC. is > running and the power goes down.......) It ought to be safe. It's designed that way and perhaps more importantly, we've actually done power-fail testing on active JFFS2 filesystems and observed that it's fine. You can do your own testing to make sure it's reliable to your own standards. The 5 blocks of GC reserved space is also fixable. We'll reduce it if and when I'm sufficiently convinced that it's safe to do so. -- dwmw2