From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
To: Nikunj Kela <nkela@cisco.com>
Cc: xe-linux-external@cisco.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jffs2: implement mount option to configure endianness
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2018 10:05:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <921b0f78cf67d7307a0555e1fd6f2c2976310adc.camel@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181106214928.40020-1-nkela@cisco.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1266 bytes --]
On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 13:49 -0800, Nikunj Kela wrote:
> This patch allows the endianness of the JFSS2 filesystem to be
> specified by mount option 'force_endian=big|little|native'. If
> endianness is not specified, it defaults to 'native' endianness
> thus retaining the existing behavior.
>
> Some architectures benefit from having a single known endianness
> of JFFS2 filesystem (for data, not executables) independent of the
> endianness of the processor (ARM processors can be switched to either
> endianness at run-time).
>
> We have boards that are shipped with BE jffs2 and BE kernel. We are
> now migrating to LE kernel. This mount option helps us in mounting
> BE jffs2 on LE kernel.
Thanks for implementing this. JFFS2 has often been very sensitive to
performance at mount time — I'd love to see how this affects the time
taken to mount a large file system. If it's significant, we may want a
config option to make this conditional?
Also, perhaps we should improve the behaviour when the user
accidentally tries to mount a wrong-endian file system. If we can't
just make it autodetect and use the "correct" endianness, perhaps we
should at least printk a message suggesting that the user try again
with the other endianness?
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature, Size: 5213 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-07 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-06 21:49 [PATCH] jffs2: implement mount option to configure endianness Nikunj Kela
2018-11-07 9:05 ` David Woodhouse [this message]
2018-11-07 9:16 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-11-07 16:12 ` David Woodhouse
2018-11-07 17:33 ` Daniel Walker
2018-11-07 17:58 ` David Woodhouse
2018-11-07 18:41 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-11-08 15:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2018-11-07 19:21 ` Daniel Walker
2018-11-07 18:04 ` Nikunj Kela (nkela)
2018-11-07 18:14 ` Richard Weinberger
2018-11-08 8:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-11-08 18:01 ` Nikunj Kela (nkela)
2018-11-08 18:50 ` Joakim Tjernlund
2018-11-08 19:47 ` David Woodhouse
2018-11-12 21:43 ` Daniel Walker
2018-11-12 22:50 ` Daniel Walker
2018-11-12 23:11 ` David Woodhouse
2018-11-12 23:40 ` Daniel Walker
2018-11-12 23:43 ` David Woodhouse
2018-11-13 0:06 ` Daniel Walker
2018-11-13 21:01 ` Daniel Walker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=921b0f78cf67d7307a0555e1fd6f2c2976310adc.camel@infradead.org \
--to=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nkela@cisco.com \
--cc=xe-linux-external@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).