From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dell-paw-3.cambridge.redhat.com ([195.224.55.237] helo=passion.cambridge.redhat.com) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17LLYq-0000xJ-00 for ; Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:22:36 +0100 From: David Woodhouse In-Reply-To: <20020621102030.9607.qmail@linuxmail.org> References: <20020621102030.9607.qmail@linuxmail.org> To: "xyz xyz" Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: X11 or microwindows on a DOC using GRUB?? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:22:32 +0100 Message-ID: <9440.1024654952@redhat.com> Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: watsup@linuxmail.org said: > hows the practical performance of microwindows? i saw some black > patches when using microwindows and screen needs to b refreshed > manually?is it a common prob in microwindows ?(i know we r going away > from the purpose of this mailing list but plz advise) No idea. You might try some of the more general-purpose fora for embedded Linux stuff. -- dwmw2