From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.175]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.68 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1JkVrW-0003DZ-Vn for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 12 Apr 2008 02:53:07 +0000 Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 29so750798wff.24 for ; Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:53:05 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <9c9fda240804111953s1ef73ecbh4e648a740c77dd0f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 11:53:05 +0900 From: "Kyungmin Park" Sender: kyungmin78@gmail.com To: dedekind@infradead.org, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Question about the size limitation of UBI MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, It's similar question with MTD size limitation. If I have a 16GiB, or 32GiB NAND, then does UBI support this chips? or similarly it needs to modify its fields? I saw the UBI2 word I don't remember the which mail. Anyway as you know it has a scalability problem. It scans all blocks. So do you have any plan to address this one? or any ideas? Thank you, Kyungmin Park