From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout4.samsung.com ([203.254.224.34]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1MJ5UK-0001wI-H4 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 12:52:45 +0000 Received: from epmmp2 (mailout4.samsung.com [203.254.224.34]) by mailout1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTP id <0KLO0012GZQ5N0@mailout1.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:51:41 +0900 (KST) Received: from apgmoorthy ([107.108.214.61]) by mmp2.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 Patch 2 (built Jul 14 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0KLO00A5ZZQ2AJ@mmp2.samsung.com> for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2009 21:51:41 +0900 (KST) Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:22:03 +0530 From: apgmoorthy Subject: RE: MLC Support in JFFS2 In-reply-to: <1245698113.25547.229.camel@macbook.infradead.org> To: 'David Woodhouse' Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <5205AB2678D945D194F6372BE9297942@sisodomain.com> <1243432517.11172.32.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1244554687.4538.16.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <9061742E1E7840C6B7016A210EF848AB@sisodomain.com> <1244712906.5847.414.camel@localhost.localdomain> <2AF67696C6634054B7CFDF7A9C19865D@sisodomain.com> <1244803363.5847.446.camel@localhost.localdomain> <3E83C7DF574149B78FFE8D12094FAF6D@sisodomain.com> <1244808209.5847.447.camel@localhost.localdomain> <5156D5DBD34A4A5984AE3F3840C0452F@sisodomain.com> <1244813557.3511.1272.camel@macbook.infradead.org> <42F6638D897B4BA7B729CBC244D9F6E4@sisodomain.com> <1245698113.25547.229.camel@macbook.infradead.org> Cc: 'Amit Kumar Sharma' , vishak.g@samsung.com, 'Amul Saha' , kyungmin.park@samsung.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi David, On Tuesday, June 23, 2009 12:45 AM David Woodhouse wrote : >> If not , Felt that any one of the following patch can be of use >> >> 1. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2007-December/020047.html >> - Which removes the Clean Marker. >There was a reason for the cleanmarker -- it saved us from using partly-erased blocks for data. Do you have some other way to guarantee that this won't >happen? - How about the second One (Refer Below Links), which leaves 1page/block for Cleanmarker. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2008-September/023101.html http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2008-September/023044.html >(Sorry, I think we may have had this discussion before, but I've forgotten the conclusion, if there was one. It was academic at the time, since we didn't >have any solution for the paired-page insanity anyway. - Right , I dont see any detailed discussion on this regard in the list. With Regards Moorthy