From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QUNPd-00028M-It for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 18:23:30 +0000 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so766852wyb.36 for ; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 11:23:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1307544476.31223.119.camel@localhost> References: <1307487717-25402-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1307487717-25402-5-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1307544476.31223.119.camel@localhost> Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2011 11:23:25 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mtd: nand: define pr_fmt() to include __func__ in debug output From: Brian Norris To: dedekind1@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: David Woodhouse , linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Igor Grinberg List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Compare: > > read_bbt: Error reading bad block table > read_bbt: error reading bad block table > > isn't the second version more correct? Or this depends on the country? I > prefer the latter, but as long as all messages are consistent, I do not > care much. What do you think? I'm not sure it's not so much language-related here, since these type of messages are just fragments anyway. I think the lowercase version is more consistent. Brian