From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QZQgA-0005Fb-QA for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 16:53:29 +0000 Received: by wwf22 with SMTP id 22so741695wwf.18 for ; Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:53:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1308717762.18119.21.camel@sauron> References: <1307563284-32416-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1307608004.7374.56.camel@localhost> <1308717762.18119.21.camel@sauron> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:53:21 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: nanddump badblock options From: Brian Norris To: dedekind1@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Mike Frysinger List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Yes, I think so. Just invent a sensible "deprecation period" plan and go > ahead with unifying them. > > Thanks! OK, I sent my v3 patch set just now. I think I documented my plan well enough in the patch set, so let me know how that looks. Thanks, Brian