From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wy0-f177.google.com ([74.125.82.177]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1QUhev-00013U-40 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 16:00:37 +0000 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so1657534wyb.36 for ; Thu, 09 Jun 2011 09:00:33 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1307605456.7374.35.camel@localhost> References: <1307544227.31223.115.camel@localhost> <1307557519-31269-1-git-send-email-computersforpeace@gmail.com> <1307605456.7374.35.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 09:00:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] mtd: nand: convert printk() to pr_*() From: Brian Norris To: dedekind1@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, David Woodhouse , Igor Grinberg List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Artem Bityutskiy wrote: > Wait, and why are we using pr_* while it is better to use dbg_* ? :-) Just so we're on the same page...did you say "dbg_*" when you really meant "dev_*"? Anyway, the answer is: I'm mostly trying to do as little shakeup as possible, so "printk" could translate pretty directly to the "pr_*" with shorter code, etc. If it makes as much (or more) sense to have the device name on all the prints, then I can just as well do it that way. Brian