From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from bay110-f40.bay110.hotmail.com ([65.54.229.50] helo=hotmail.com)
	by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1FkBlQ-00027r-Jk
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 27 May 2006 23:16:29 -0400
Message-ID: <BAY110-F408C270588868018C9B3D3BC9C0@phx.gbl>
From: "Han Chang" <posaune@hotmail.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 19:58:53 -0700
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
Subject: FAT vs jFFS2 for NAND.
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Hi there,

My first question is that if I can use FAT file system for NAND. If yes, 
what are the pros and cons for using FAT vs. JFFS2.

Many thanks,
Han