From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bay7-f32.bay7.hotmail.com ([64.4.11.57] helo=hotmail.com) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1Dhzo7-0001U3-4p for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:01:41 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20050613072709.GB26966@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> From: "tong changda" To: joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 08:44:03 +0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312; format=flowed Cc: dedekind@yandex.ru, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, munira.ahmed@radixs.com Subject: Re: jffs2 corrupt rarely, how to fix it? List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Thanks, one last question After I had porting the mtd/jffs2 code, how to confirm that the problem is fixed? That is, Is there some ways to make these bugs to be more easily appeared on arm-linux-2.4.19/20? >From: J鰎n Engel >To: tong changda >CC: munira.ahmed@radixs.com, dedekind@yandex.ru,linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org >Subject: Re: jffs2 corrupt rarely, how to fix it? >Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 09:27:09 +0200 > >On Mon, 13 June 2005 10:23:28 +0800, tong changda wrote: > > > > Seem a little hard for me > > I guess all changeset for jffs2 is limited in fs/jffs2/. the interface with > > mtd should keep unchanged, If so, is it easier to start from linux-2.4.31 > > instead of 2.6.11.11? > >Most likely. It should still be quite a bit of work. An mtd update >once caused people to claim that I effectively updated our kernel. It >pulled in quite a bit from header files that didn't exist in the old >kernel, etc. > >J鰎n > >-- >And spam is a useful source of entropy for /dev/random too! >-- Jasmine Strong _________________________________________________________________ 与联机的朋友进行交流，请使用 MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com/cn