From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from if02-mail-sr03-mia.mta.terra.com ([208.84.243.30]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1P7Zkr-0000d4-AL for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:22:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fl=C3=A1vio_Silveira?= To: "Guillaume LECERF" References: <74A5BE60138147F696E151AACD52EDEE@THOR><341EADF720C14B4F86C63204D9C60723@THOR><6E1A182A06054C5A99BD3C0D3202C24F@THOR><8129711D4006470194ABF97D154047CF@THOR> In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Help] SST39VF6401B Support Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2010 18:22:27 -0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sorry for the delay, I was travelling. Not yet, I couldn't build a firmware without your patch to test it, perhaps in the middle of this week, but I'm guessing it is needed. Flavio ----- Original Message ----- From: "Guillaume LECERF" To: "Flávio Silveira" Cc: Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 8:48 AM Subject: Re: [Help] SST39VF6401B Support > 2010/10/5 Flávio Silveira : >> Actually yes, I applied your patch to kernel 2.6.35.4 and it detects the >> chip. >> I just need to test without your patch to see the difference. > > Up. > > Did you had time to test without the patch to see if it's actually needed > ? > > -- > Guillaume LECERF > GeeXboX developer - www.geexbox.org > > ______________________________________________________ > Linux MTD discussion mailing list > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/ >