public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christopher Fowler" <cfowler@outpostsentinel.com>
To: Cam Mayor <cmayor@iders.ca>,linux MTD mailing list
	<linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: open question on flash speed/app blocking
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 13:44:03 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <E16QYZ1-00041c-00@host3.hosting4everyone.com> (raw)

I've noticed that when I write to a file on my DOC2000 that they bus 
does not block until the bufffers are flushd.  My flashing program 
issues a sync() before unmounting the flash.  I even write a 21kb 
config to a raw partition.  That can take a while too.    I'm not sure 
if there is a way around this.  On the DOC2000 you need to use at least 
a block size of 4096.  Since the M-SYS driver reads and writes in those 
block sizes.  Maybe some other people here can talk about this subject.

Chris

> Hi all,
> 
> We're making an app that periodically writes a persistance file to 
flash.  I 
> haven't actually gotten a flash file system area working yet on my 
board, so 
> i can't test this yet for speed.   I know that the results will vary 
with the 
> hardware, the filesystem used, and a handful of other factors.  I'm 
assuming 
> that a write to the flash will be blocking - that is, nothing else 
will be 
> allowed to happen on the bus while that function is being performed.
> 
> For a file the size of 32bytes, 1kByte, and 32kBtyes, what kind of 
blocking 
> delay might one expect from linux writing to flash for each of those 
file 
> sizes?  What would be an optimum flash filesystem to use for 
something like 
> this?  (if there is one)
> 
> cheers,
> cam
> 
> ps. i'm using linux 2.4.6-rmk1-rayl1 and 2.4.16-rmk2.  I could use 
the latest 
> kernel, too, i just haven't gotten around to it.  For development 
purposes, 
> i'm using a cirrus CDB89712 development board, which has the cs89712 
> processor and some Intel 28f320B3 flash on it.
> 
> ______________________________________________________
> Linux MTD discussion mailing list
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
> 
> 

             reply	other threads:[~2002-01-15 18:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-01-15 18:44 Christopher Fowler [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-01-15 18:18 open question on flash speed/app blocking Cam Mayor
2002-01-16 19:47 ` Herman Oosthuysen
2002-01-16 21:18   ` Vipin Malik
     [not found] ` <000e01c19ec6$b2cd5980$0100007f@localdomain.wni.com.wireles snetworksinc.com>
2002-01-16 22:47   ` Mark Sienkiewicz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=E16QYZ1-00041c-00@host3.hosting4everyone.com \
    --to=cfowler@outpostsentinel.com \
    --cc=cmayor@iders.ca \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox