From: "Stephan Linke" <Stephan.Linke@epygi.de>
To: <tglx@linutronix.de>, "David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
<jasmine@regolith.co.uk>
Cc: Charles Manning <manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: RE: nand flash driver
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 09:33:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <FCEAKDJJAPHPLJFINDAJGEJBDEAA.Stephan.Linke@epygi.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200307110218.28358.tglx@linutronix.de>
Hi,
>
> It will work with addresslines, if
>
> 1. All datasheets are reliable
> 2. Your hardwaredesigner can precalculate all the timings in details even
> under high interrupt load !!!!
> 3. the softwareguy is aware of the above problems
>
> My experience is (I have a bunch of different solutions here on top of my
> desk):
>
> Either you have a genius in hardware and software design available or you have
> a rock solid solution with GPIO/FPGA/CPLD. The second one will either
> increase your production costs by <1$ per piece or decrease your performance
> by about 8%.
> Both negatives will be less than the debugging and redesign costs.
>
I don't know exactly what our hardware guys did but from softer perspective I can say the most "difficult" part is to copy nand_command() and modify it so it uses your addresses to switch between data, address and command mode. You can remove a few calls of hwcontrol(). Write your own hwcontrol() and dev_ready() function, that's it. Few magic in there.
The important question is: did the hardware designer a good job? And I hope ours did. ;-)
Stephan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-11 7:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-07 2:33 nand flash driver gjx
2003-07-08 23:21 ` Charles Manning
2003-07-10 13:05 ` jasmine
2003-07-10 14:20 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-10 15:12 ` jasmine
2003-07-10 15:32 ` David Woodhouse
2003-07-11 0:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2003-07-11 7:33 ` Stephan Linke [this message]
2003-07-10 16:50 ` Russ Dill
2003-07-10 22:16 ` Charles Manning
2003-07-10 22:12 ` nand flash driver -> ALE etc Charles Manning
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2009-08-05 19:40 Nand flash driver Spinelli, Claudio (Claudio)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=FCEAKDJJAPHPLJFINDAJGEJBDEAA.Stephan.Linke@epygi.de \
--to=stephan.linke@epygi.de \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=jasmine@regolith.co.uk \
--cc=manningc2@actrix.gen.nz \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox