From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from dsl-64-130-201-237.telocity.com ([64.130.201.237] helo=Dual166.localdomain)
	by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 16U8oT-0003Hd-00
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 16:02:49 +0000
Received: from nt40server ([192.168.1.101])
	by Dual166.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA17422
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:13:50 -0800
Reply-To: <acurtis@onz.com>
From: "Allen Curtis" <acurtis@onz.com>
To: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: JFFS2 and NAND Flash
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2002 08:05:54 -0800
Message-ID: <NCBBIINEHIPFGJPLBEIFEEKMDDAA.acurtis@onz.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/>

Could someone explain what the current limitations are implementing JFFS2 on
NANAD flash. I just made a recommendation to management to go this way so I
was surprised to see the prior posting. I would be willing to fix this
problem if a little background could be provided.

Thanks