From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from dsl-64-130-201-237.telocity.com ([64.130.201.237] helo=localhost.onz.COM) by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 17XxZA-0002xW-00 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2002 06:23:04 +0100 Received: from nt40server (nt40server [192.168.1.101]) by localhost.onz.COM (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g6Q5MVk22919 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:22:32 -0700 Reply-To: From: "Allen Curtis" To: Subject: What happened to 64-bit support? Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:22:31 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-mtd-admin@lists.infradead.org List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: I have had a chance to continue working on my Read-Only problem and have discovered that the flash is getting mounted as if it was ROM. Our system is configured with 4-16bit Strata flash devices and should be using the CFI interface. It appears that the flash is being recognized as CFI compliant bus fails the buswidth test. Using the latest CVS code I recompiled with DEBUG, genprobe...() reports that it does not support buswidth of 8. jedec_probe...() did not work. It did appear to work with the ROM mapped to RAM option but this also the reason that it is always mounted Read-Only. I retrieved linux-2_4-branch from CVS, it appears that this does not have 64-bit bus support either. Looking at cfi_probe(), the case statement does not support buswidth of 8. Where can I find the 64-bit patches?