From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC6FFC4332F for ; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:37:08 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=QoH8c2n0+w01a6A4P/FrXu3GbdVaVjZOZTwsWdcCIXU=; b=p0dBU/SR2/jseD 2ASPX09PmPRFLm2oO/OdPDVi8/ryBiZdDjMFzY1OS3oJts3zZZOQU8Hfn7KMYlk0DxYlA3tvwpgiH 5EDRhhEupDPyY2eYrbrITZXKSpSReSmjXwTmOlSVw9a3zpbCIv0cjh+Vyl9Xnuo4E7op+9PWezFWM IeXsUWxy3K86Le6EA9RhqMtN8xMHYgXohKy05w+UHOVtFXRNZrSHY9kqgeg770EtHmZ7O10GqhIrD IScfa05LoGLrM47m2yk8AAffDVAI2ig6uCsx3WUB4zk3UkspMzAqBzL2LAkA1Flv/Sb8YzdLNFnYV D84rWzMG3Ahk0TaC5ldw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1olkiN-005T0F-F7; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:37:03 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([139.178.84.217]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1olkiK-005SzV-VR for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:37:02 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B01061D9D; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:37:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DD180C433C1; Fri, 21 Oct 2022 05:36:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1666330619; bh=C4x6hYFDAWi4DXcimrF67aLQPsZW93Mx96V0amCnWn8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=QlbKpgGx1qrMgSdaJyivXXf5qor/X961lpc0yRR+woSzH3tCcgiu1gmz/NBYEXQfe K4vsmjcCVpegODndBu2vg9R9eT4zstEkXIb1SfoFeTNCPoQOhnVD+4siGARAhiytQw tUVK0o7ipMo473nLX2GyW5d8TYlaC0oYKW+aMHhw= Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2022 07:37:48 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Luben Tuikov Cc: Yang Yingliang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, rafael@kernel.org, somlo@cmu.edu, mst@redhat.com, jaegeuk@kernel.org, chao@kernel.org, hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com, huangjianan@oppo.com, mark@fasheh.com, jlbec@evilplan.org, joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alexander.deucher@amd.com, richard@nod.at, liushixin2@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] fix memory leak while kset_register() fails Message-ID: References: <20221021022102.2231464-1-yangyingliang@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221020_223701_073856_A2526943 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, Oct 21, 2022 at 01:29:31AM -0400, Luben Tuikov wrote: > On 2022-10-20 22:20, Yang Yingliang wrote: > > The previous discussion link: > > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0db486eb-6927-927e-3629-958f8f211194@huawei.com/T/ > > The very first discussion on this was here: > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg368077.html > > Please use this link, and not the that one up there you which quoted above, > and whose commit description is taken verbatim from the this link. > > > > > kset_register() is currently used in some places without calling > > kset_put() in error path, because the callers think it should be > > kset internal thing to do, but the driver core can not know what > > caller doing with that memory at times. The memory could be freed > > both in kset_put() and error path of caller, if it is called in > > kset_register(). > > As I explained in the link above, the reason there's > a memory leak is that one cannot call kset_register() without > the kset->kobj.name being set--kobj_add_internal() returns -EINVAL, > in this case, i.e. kset_register() fails with -EINVAL. > > Thus, the most common usage is something like this: > > kobj_set_name(&kset->kobj, format, ...); > kset->kobj.kset = parent_kset; > kset->kobj.ktype = ktype; > res = kset_register(kset); > > So, what is being leaked, is the memory allocated in kobj_set_name(), > by the common idiom shown above. This needs to be mentioned in > the documentation, at least, in case, in the future this is absolved > in kset_register() redesign, etc. Based on this, can kset_register() just clean up from itself when an error happens? Ideally that would be the case, as the odds of a kset being embedded in a larger structure is probably slim, but we would have to search the tree to make sure. thanks, greg k-h ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/