From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BE42C4332F for ; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:25:38 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=Ybj/9bDl13dfUTZBiN13FFnfNEfQ0xMWnUitRLJnCl8=; b=uLPho1frBf3SJA hmK6aL5faMFySRQP4jPGzH63xUXWoKqkRrQlynh7m6WV+1Ai+HAKZo6Ra6ig2QDUyzEIfyVIniT86 k+rrygtz/oyW7R31TZt02yqBvt6kJds2ziM6FhzqdhARwAgn9X9WV9Ua/ne1+jlOAxjGzpDU1wS0D 7OK04V66b7jPqsTUgusUa5EYrXumuxesZapTQUOaAY5KBPXqGverQhx9PEZvlpZuXsYNDJ2iZdnnQ 3H7aFkcPe+g5b2wZLck69BDGgu167y4jFEOPsOBRGtO6xf4VTq6QuKbyMTx2RdY9vE4Wft/5Z6F8M 3eRzFMKSWz/QBqNf6Y0g==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oxSKp-0092qp-Uv; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:25:07 +0000 Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1oxSKn-0092lu-Dt for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 12:25:06 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1669119905; x=1700655905; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cY6HgbrxlA3QWS/f+X29cpCFkfoRWuud2FEA31Hsz+8=; b=RlLDyLZfBF1lOnZV49JK2XCis/93iKwPzVSUD4LDynQhiMzjL6VCcqsQ BnkjIvJaALUK6n5N7rOXT8R5JeWIF64b6/EkT5t0mOEHyZieE0r+bGvfS zwyeuGKO8Y2tcl4oRyXXibfewKie3Dr/ICQp3wio82CC3FLbH7308ExKl Y0D/fHHJwRmZdxb1QnYwe17OXP6KmuNYroW49uQ2gMazvIhnDxnc8C0BU oREjpoTm/VQd+En+BQu9r5LPPkPYGgutgCd+2uWXkbrJWrqtBXE4YfykC /vARrU0doZHYT24BWke9JZNtQRQamuTzAShKtifccE4XYk3ngSDpYiAaN g==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10538"; a="314951424" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,183,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="314951424" Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Nov 2022 04:25:02 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6500,9779,10538"; a="730374965" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.96,184,1665471600"; d="scan'208";a="730374965" Received: from black.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.28]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Nov 2022 04:24:59 -0800 Received: by black.fi.intel.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6787D128; Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:25:25 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 14:25:25 +0200 From: Mika Westerberg To: Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com Cc: pratyush@kernel.org, michael@walle.cc, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: spi-nor: gigadevice: Add support for gd25lr256e Message-ID: References: <20221023065838.53616-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <959a3de3-dd71-acaa-d26b-0e93f3db820a@microchip.com> <870780c6-6f2e-9b90-6540-2c408f206f6b@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <870780c6-6f2e-9b90-6540-2c408f206f6b@microchip.com> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221122_042505_561296_8B667AC9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 11.87 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi, On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 11:59:47AM +0000, Tudor.Ambarus@microchip.com wrote: > sure, it's fine, yes. Did you test the locking part of your patch? > I'm asking because if you don't need the locking or you're not able to test > it, then you can use the spi-nor-generic driver introduced by Michael at > [1] and you won't need an entry for the flash at all. Nice! I think this one should be enough for us. It's coming for v6.2 right? ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/