From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org,
drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, nbd@other.debian.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org,
dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:32:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZoOs9wdR1yBPB-7J@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZoJnO09LBj6kApY7@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 04:22:19PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> from below, it seems the patchset doesn't introduce any performance improvement
> but a regression now. is this expected?
Not having the improvement at least alleviate my concerns about data
integrity. I'm still curious where it comes from as it isn't exactly
expected.
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-02 7:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-25 2:28 [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement kernel test robot
2024-06-25 8:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-26 2:10 ` Oliver Sang
2024-06-26 3:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-06-27 2:35 ` Oliver Sang
2024-06-27 4:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-07-01 8:22 ` Oliver Sang
2024-07-02 7:32 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZoOs9wdR1yBPB-7J@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com \
--cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
--cc=fengwei.yin@intel.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-um@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=nvdimm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox