From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@intel.com>
To: Alexander Usyskin <alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
Cc: "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Lucas De Marchi" <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
"Thomas Hellström" <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>,
"Rodrigo Vivi" <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"Joonas Lahtinen" <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
"Tvrtko Ursulin" <tursulin@ursulin.net>,
"Karthik Poosa" <karthik.poosa@intel.com>,
"Reuven Abliyev" <reuven.abliyev@intel.com>,
"Oren Weil" <oren.jer.weil@intel.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Tomas Winkler" <tomasw@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 03/12] mtd: intel-dg: implement region enumeration
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 12:44:13 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBCfbaYs9CnXL2h1@black.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250424132536.3043825-4-alexander.usyskin@intel.com>
On Thu, Apr 24, 2025 at 04:25:27PM +0300, Alexander Usyskin wrote:
> In intel-dg, there is no access to the spi controller,
> the information is extracted from the descriptor region.
...
> @@ -22,9 +24,199 @@ struct intel_dg_nvm {
> u8 id;
> u64 offset;
> u64 size;
> + unsigned int is_readable:1;
> + unsigned int is_writable:1;
> } regions[] __counted_by(nregions);
> };
>
> +#define NVM_TRIGGER_REG 0x00000000
> +#define NVM_VALSIG_REG 0x00000010
> +#define NVM_ADDRESS_REG 0x00000040
> +#define NVM_REGION_ID_REG 0x00000044
> +/*
> + * [15:0]-Erase size = 0x0010 4K 0x0080 32K 0x0100 64K
> + * [23:16]-Reserved
> + * [31:24]-Erase MEM RegionID
> + */
> +#define NVM_ERASE_REG 0x00000048
> +#define NVM_ACCESS_ERROR_REG 0x00000070
> +#define NVM_ADDRESS_ERROR_REG 0x00000074
> +
> +/* Flash Valid Signature */
> +#define NVM_FLVALSIG 0x0FF0A55A
> +
> +#define NVM_MAP_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(7, 0)
> +#define NVM_MAP_ADDR_SHIFT 0x00000004
> +
> +#define NVM_REGION_ID_DESCRIPTOR 0
> +/* Flash Region Base Address */
> +#define NVM_FRBA 0x40
> +/* Flash Region __n - Flash Descriptor Record */
> +#define NVM_FLREG(__n) (NVM_FRBA + ((__n) * 4))
> +/* Flash Map 1 Register */
> +#define NVM_FLMAP1_REG 0x18
> +#define NVM_FLMSTR4_OFFSET 0x00C
> +
> +#define NVM_ACCESS_ERROR_PCIE_MASK 0x7
> +
> +#define NVM_FREG_BASE_MASK GENMASK(15, 0)
> +#define NVM_FREG_ADDR_MASK GENMASK(31, 16)
> +#define NVM_FREG_ADDR_SHIFT 12
> +#define NVM_FREG_MIN_REGION_SIZE 0xFFF
Should we move these to a header?
> +static inline void idg_nvm_set_region_id(struct intel_dg_nvm *nvm, u8 region)
> +{
> + iowrite32((u32)region, nvm->base + NVM_REGION_ID_REG);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 idg_nvm_error(struct intel_dg_nvm *nvm)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = nvm->base;
> +
> + u32 reg = ioread32(base + NVM_ACCESS_ERROR_REG) & NVM_ACCESS_ERROR_PCIE_MASK;
> +
> + /* reset error bits */
> + if (reg)
> + iowrite32(reg, base + NVM_ACCESS_ERROR_REG);
> +
> + return reg;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 idg_nvm_read32(struct intel_dg_nvm *nvm, u32 address)
> +{
> + void __iomem *base = nvm->base;
> +
> + iowrite32(address, base + NVM_ADDRESS_REG);
> +
> + return ioread32(base + NVM_TRIGGER_REG);
> +}
> +
> +static int idg_nvm_get_access_map(struct intel_dg_nvm *nvm, u32 *access_map)
> +{
> + u32 flmap1;
> + u32 fmba;
> + u32 fmstr4;
> + u32 fmstr4_addr;
Nit: These are in order of appearance vs reverse xmas tree in other places.
Perhaps make them consistent?
> + idg_nvm_set_region_id(nvm, NVM_REGION_ID_DESCRIPTOR);
> +
> + flmap1 = idg_nvm_read32(nvm, NVM_FLMAP1_REG);
> + if (idg_nvm_error(nvm))
> + return -EIO;
> + /* Get Flash Master Baser Address (FMBA) */
> + fmba = (FIELD_GET(NVM_MAP_ADDR_MASK, flmap1) << NVM_MAP_ADDR_SHIFT);
> + fmstr4_addr = fmba + NVM_FLMSTR4_OFFSET;
> +
> + fmstr4 = idg_nvm_read32(nvm, fmstr4_addr);
> + if (idg_nvm_error(nvm))
> + return -EIO;
> +
> + *access_map = fmstr4;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static bool idg_nvm_region_readable(u32 access_map, u8 region)
> +{
> + if (region < 12)
Anything special about 12? Should it have a macro def somewhere?
> + return access_map & BIT(region + 8); /* [19:8] */
> + else
> + return access_map & BIT(region - 12); /* [3:0] */
> +}
> +
> +static bool idg_nvm_region_writable(u32 access_map, u8 region)
> +{
> + if (region < 12)
Ditto.
> + return access_map & BIT(region + 20); /* [31:20] */
> + else
> + return access_map & BIT(region - 8); /* [7:4] */
> +}
Raag
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 9:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 13:25 [PATCH v9 00/12] mtd: add driver for Intel discrete graphics Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 01/12] mtd: core: always create master device Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 02/12] mtd: add driver for intel graphics non-volatile memory device Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-29 9:31 ` Raag Jadav
2025-05-15 10:11 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2025-05-15 12:13 ` Raag Jadav
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 03/12] mtd: intel-dg: implement region enumeration Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-29 9:44 ` Raag Jadav [this message]
2025-05-15 11:23 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2025-05-15 12:19 ` Raag Jadav
2025-05-15 13:07 ` Usyskin, Alexander
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 04/12] mtd: intel-dg: implement access functions Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 05/12] mtd: intel-dg: register with mtd Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 06/12] mtd: intel-dg: align 64bit read and write Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 07/12] mtd: intel-dg: wake card on operations Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 08/12] drm/i915/nvm: add nvm device for discrete graphics Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 09/12] drm/i915/nvm: add support for access mode Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 10/12] drm/xe/nvm: add on-die non-volatile memory device Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 11/12] drm/xe/nvm: add support for access mode Alexander Usyskin
2025-04-24 13:25 ` [PATCH v9 12/12] drm/xe/nvm: add support for non-posted erase Alexander Usyskin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBCfbaYs9CnXL2h1@black.fi.intel.com \
--to=raag.jadav@intel.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.usyskin@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=karthik.poosa@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=oren.jer.weil@intel.com \
--cc=reuven.abliyev@intel.com \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tomasw@gmail.com \
--cc=tursulin@ursulin.net \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox