From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr ([192.134.164.105]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.76 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1SNzzJ-0001E7-1o for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 05:14:30 +0000 Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 07:06:16 +0200 (CEST) From: Julia Lawall To: dwmw2@infradead.org Subject: question about fs/jffs2/readinode.c Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , The function read_direntry in fs/jffs2/readinode.c contains the following code: err = jffs2_flash_read(c, (ref_offset(ref)) + read, rd->nsize - already, &read, &fd->name[already]); if (unlikely(read != rd->nsize - already) && likely(!err)) return -EIO; if (unlikely(err)) { JFFS2_ERROR("read remainder of name: error %d\n", err); jffs2_free_full_dirent(fd); return -EIO; } Is it intentional that the first if doesn't free fd? At first I thought that that might be the case, because what would be the point of having two conditionals if they are going to do the same thing. But I can't see why fd should not be freed either, so maybe the two conditionals are just there to give different error messages? thanks, julia