From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:33:11 +0900 (JST) From: Linus Torvalds To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/5] core: Add kernel message dumper to call on oopses and panics In-Reply-To: <20091019125017.GA9030@elte.hu> Message-ID: References: <20091015093133.GF10546@elte.hu> <20091015161052.0752208e@marrow.netinsight.se> <20091015154640.GA11408@elte.hu> <20091016094601.4e2c2d3e@marrow.netinsight.se> <20091016080935.GA3895@elte.hu> <1255681467.32489.360.camel@localhost> <20091016112556.6902b2dc@marrow.netinsight.se> <20091016101045.GA3263@elte.hu> <20091016140918.3981cfa2@marrow.netinsight.se> <1255952922.32489.505.camel@localhost> <20091019125017.GA9030@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Artem Bityutskiy , LKML , "Koskinen Aaro \(Nokia-D/Helsinki\)" , linux-mtd , Simon Kagstrom , Andrew Morton , David Woodhouse , Alan Cox List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > I wonder, via which tree this should go in. We are going to have mtdoops > > depend on this. Should we go one of these ways: > > > > * this patch goes to one of Ingo's tip trees, so we can pull it and > > work on top. > > * we have Ingo's / Linus' acks, and this goes via the MTD tree. > > ? > > Either way is good to me. Linus, do you have any preferences? Either works for me. Linus