From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from tundra.namei.org ([65.99.196.166] helo=namei.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZyqNC-0000Qs-Hr for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 Nov 2015 00:13:18 +0000 Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:12:51 +1100 (AEDT) From: James Morris To: Seth Forshee cc: "Eric W. Biederman" , Casey Schaufler , Alexander Viro , Serge Hallyn , Andy Lutomirski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, James Morris , "Serge E. Hallyn" Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] Smack: Handle labels consistently in untrusted mounts In-Reply-To: <1447778351-118699-8-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> Message-ID: References: <1447778351-118699-1-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> <1447778351-118699-8-git-send-email-seth.forshee@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, Seth Forshee wrote: > + sbsp = inode->i_sb->s_security; > + if ((sbsp->smk_flags & SMK_SB_UNTRUSTED) && Where is SMK_SB_UNTRUSTED defined? I can't see it in this patch series, mainline or security next. -- James Morris