From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-12.7 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889EBC43464 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2881F20735 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:56:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="PFHyV0tb" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 2881F20735 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=suse.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Subject: From:References:To:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=rXuAYPv4f8DD8EinrtlgHpDxTw3J6lMaOCLgcGSaD10=; b=PFHyV0tblaad3bb4mtL8brvlG W1nd8ooln5Tvw6WD77jcl0gCsYA2YhV2ximGoZD7azelIU34av5Y4XsEJ0st2zEKMnTrGYGsR5we5 hbJ4XLjcXvMYl0qWZo47PzyEkWwtCnvzzsIKJSr889Hy2Wnt12Ng9tRvVD7Y3n3cxm/e25l9rBT+z a1u4PdVa5QunZprmfCG5dserL+NW9VzL3AwOApJpQodgFXyCuNiAr8soOeHZVTxaC93K2gUuXeE2d ZeTlwZnikbexi0OHimH+k/3mzndRnROr7PWXn7naGHXRnoT7NSZmwDKQcg1XzFJnfh0RzqKxqm+1U MapRi9tDA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kKIXQ-0003S3-AD; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:55:12 +0000 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kKIXN-0003Qn-Ce for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:55:10 +0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.221.27]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A091AF0B; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:55:43 +0000 (UTC) To: Christoph Hellwig References: <20200921080734.452759-1-hch@lst.de> <20200921080734.452759-4-hch@lst.de> From: Coly Li Autocrypt: addr=colyli@suse.de; keydata= mQINBFYX6S8BEAC9VSamb2aiMTQREFXK4K/W7nGnAinca7MRuFUD4JqWMJ9FakNRd/E0v30F qvZ2YWpidPjaIxHwu3u9tmLKqS+2vnP0k7PRHXBYbtZEMpy3kCzseNfdrNqwJ54A430BHf2S GMVRVENiScsnh4SnaYjFVvB8SrlhTsgVEXEBBma5Ktgq9YSoy5miatWmZvHLFTQgFMabCz/P j5/xzykrF6yHo0rHZtwzQzF8rriOplAFCECp/t05+OeHHxjSqSI0P/G79Ll+AJYLRRm9til/ K6yz/1hX5xMToIkYrshDJDrUc8DjEpISQQPhG19PzaUf3vFpmnSVYprcWfJWsa2wZyyjRFkf J51S82WfclafNC6N7eRXedpRpG6udUAYOA1YdtlyQRZa84EJvMzW96iSL1Gf+ZGtRuM3k49H 1wiWOjlANiJYSIWyzJjxAd/7Xtiy/s3PRKL9u9y25ftMLFa1IljiDG+mdY7LyAGfvdtIkanr iBpX4gWXd7lNQFLDJMfShfu+CTMCdRzCAQ9hIHPmBeZDJxKq721CyBiGAhRxDN+TYiaG/UWT 7IB7LL4zJrIe/xQ8HhRO+2NvT89o0LxEFKBGg39yjTMIrjbl2ZxY488+56UV4FclubrG+t16 r2KrandM7P5RjR+cuHhkKseim50Qsw0B+Eu33Hjry7YCihmGswARAQABtBhDb2x5IExpIDxj b2x5bGlAc3VzZS5kZT6JAlYEEwEIAEACGyMHCwkIBwMCAQYVCAIJCgsEFgIDAQIeAQIXgBYh BOo+RS/0+Uhgjej60Mc5B5Nrffj8BQJcR84dBQkY++fuAAoJEMc5B5Nrffj8ixcP/3KAKg1X EcoW4u/0z+Ton5rCyb/NpAww8MuRjNW82UBUac7yCi1y3OW7NtLjuBLw5SaVG5AArb7IF3U0 qTOobqfl5XHsT0o5wFHZaKUrnHb6y7V3SplsJWfkP3JmOooJsQB3z3K96ZTkFelsNb0ZaBRu gV+LA4MomhQ+D3BCDR1it1OX/tpvm2uaDF6s/8uFtcDEM9eQeqATN/QAJ49nvU/I8zDSY9rc 0x9mP0x+gH4RccbnoPu/rUG6Fm1ZpLrbb6NpaYBBJ/V1BC4lIOjnd24bsoQrQmnJn9dSr60X 1MY60XDszIyzRw7vbJcUn6ZzPNFDxFFT9diIb+wBp+DD8ZlD/hnVpl4f921ZbvfOSsXAJrKB 1hGY17FPwelp1sPcK2mDT+pfHEMV+OQdZzD2OCKtza/5IYismJJm3oVUYMogb5vDNAw9X2aP XgwUuG+FDEFPamFMUwIfzYHcePfqf0mMsaeSgtA/xTxzx/0MLjUJHl46Bc0uKDhv7QUyGz0j Ywgr2mHTvG+NWQ/mDeHNGkcnsnp3IY7koDHnN2xMFXzY4bn9m8ctqKo2roqjCzoxD/njoAhf KBzdybLHATqJG/yiZSbCxDA1n/J4FzPyZ0rNHUAJ/QndmmVspE9syFpFCKigvvyrzm016+k+ FJ59Q6RG4MSy/+J565Xj+DNY3/dCuQINBFYX6S8BEADZP+2cl4DRFaSaBms08W8/smc5T2CO YhAoygZn71rB7Djml2ZdvrLRjR8Qbn0Q/2L2gGUVc63pJnbrjlXSx2LfAFE0SlfYIJ11aFdF 9w7RvqWByQjDJor3Z0fWvPExplNgMvxpD0U0QrVT5dIGTx9hadejCl/ug09Lr6MPQn+a4+qs aRWwgCSHaIuDkH3zI1MJXiqXXFKUzJ/Fyx6R72rqiMPHH2nfwmMu6wOXAXb7+sXjZz5Po9GJ g2OcEc+rpUtKUJGyeQsnCDxUcqJXZDBi/GnhPCcraQuqiQ7EGWuJfjk51vaI/rW4bZkA9yEP B9rBYngbz7cQymUsfxuTT8OSlhxjP3l4ZIZFKIhDaQeZMj8pumBfEVUyiF6KVSfgfNQ/5PpM R4/pmGbRqrAAElhrRPbKQnCkGWDr8zG+AjN1KF6rHaFgAIO7TtZ+F28jq4reLkur0N5tQFww wFwxzROdeLHuZjL7eEtcnNnzSkXHczLkV4kQ3+vr/7Gm65mQfnVpg6JpwpVrbDYQeOFlxZ8+ GERY5Dag4KgKa/4cSZX2x/5+KkQx9wHwackw5gDCvAdZ+Q81nm6tRxEYBBiVDQZYqO73stgT ZyrkxykUbQIy8PI+g7XMDCMnPiDncQqgf96KR3cvw4wN8QrgA6xRo8xOc2C3X7jTMQUytCz9 0MyV1QARAQABiQI8BBgBCAAmAhsMFiEE6j5FL/T5SGCN6PrQxzkHk2t9+PwFAlxHziAFCRj7 5/EACgkQxzkHk2t9+PxgfA//cH5R1DvpJPwraTAl24SUcG9EWe+NXyqveApe05nk15zEuxxd e4zFEjo+xYZilSveLqYHrm/amvQhsQ6JLU+8N60DZHVcXbw1Eb8CEjM5oXdbcJpXh1/1BEwl 4phsQMkxOTns51bGDhTQkv4lsZKvNByB9NiiMkT43EOx14rjkhHw3rnqoI7ogu8OO7XWfKcL CbchjJ8t3c2XK1MUe056yPpNAT2XPNF2EEBPG2Y2F4vLgEbPv1EtpGUS1+JvmK3APxjXUl5z 6xrxCQDWM5AAtGfM/IswVjbZYSJYyH4BQKrShzMb0rWUjkpXvvjsjt8rEXpZEYJgX9jvCoxt oqjCKiVLpwje9WkEe9O9VxljmPvxAhVqJjX62S+TGp93iD+mvpCoHo3+CcvyRcilz+Ko8lfO hS9tYT0HDUiDLvpUyH1AR2xW9RGDevGfwGTpF0K6cLouqyZNdhlmNciX48tFUGjakRFsxRmX K0Jx4CEZubakJe+894sX6pvNFiI7qUUdB882i5GR3v9ijVPhaMr8oGuJ3kvwBIA8lvRBGVGn 9xvzkQ8Prpbqh30I4NMp8MjFdkwCN6znBKPHdjNTwE5PRZH0S9J0o67IEIvHfH0eAWAsgpTz +jwc7VKH7vkvgscUhq/v1/PEWCAqh9UHy7R/jiUxwzw/288OpgO+i+2l11Y= Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] bcache: inherit the optimal I/O size Message-ID: Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:54:59 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20200921080734.452759-4-hch@lst.de> Content-Language: en-US X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200921_055509_659042_F8ED7097 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 21.91 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jens Axboe , linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, Hans de Goede , Justin Sanders , Minchan Kim , Johannes Thumshirn , linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Song Liu , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Richard Weinberger , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 2020/9/21 16:07, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Inherit the optimal I/O size setting just like the readahead window, > as any reason to do larger I/O does not apply to just readahead. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > --- > drivers/md/bcache/super.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > index 1bbdc410ee3c51..48113005ed86ad 100644 > --- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c > @@ -1430,6 +1430,8 @@ static int cached_dev_init(struct cached_dev *dc, unsigned int block_size) > dc->disk.disk->queue->backing_dev_info->ra_pages = > max(dc->disk.disk->queue->backing_dev_info->ra_pages, > q->backing_dev_info->ra_pages); > + blk_queue_io_opt(dc->disk.disk->queue, > + max(queue_io_opt(dc->disk.disk->queue), queue_io_opt(q))); > Hi Christoph, I am not sure whether virtual bcache device's optimal request size can be simply set like this. Most of time inherit backing device's optimal request size is fine, but there are two exceptions, - Read request hits on cache device - User sets sequential_cuttoff as 0, all writing may go into cache device firstly. For the above two conditions, all I/Os goes into cache device, using optimal request size of backing device might be improper. Just a guess, is it OK to set the optimal request size of the virtual bcache device as the least common multiple of cache device's and backing device's optimal request sizes ? [snipped] Thanks. Coly Li ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/