From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from esa4.microchip.iphmx.com ([68.232.154.123]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1fJeyZ-0001Z1-T7 for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 18 May 2018 12:59:30 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: spi-nor: add support for Microchip 25LC256 To: Marek Vasut , Boris Brezillon CC: , , , , , , References: <20180504155404.5285-1-radu.pirea@microchip.com> <20180504204013.254d90cf@bbrezillon> <1db092c8-95fb-5747-f7b9-f6a215b1aa5b@gmail.com> <30ab9516-abc9-d2d5-79ea-266c682c5fa9@gmail.com> <1993151b-4434-c671-8498-b6488288f5f6@microchip.com> From: Radu Pirea Message-ID: Date: Fri, 18 May 2018 16:00:15 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On 05/18/2018 01:03 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: > On 05/18/2018 11:50 AM, Radu Pirea wrote: >> >> >> On 05/16/2018 04:47 PM, Marek Vasut wrote: >>> On 05/16/2018 12:05 PM, Radu Pirea wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2018-05-16 at 00:17 +0200, Marek Vasut wrote: >>>>> On 05/15/2018 06:22 PM, Radu Pirea wrote: >>>>>> On Fri, 2018-05-04 at 20:40 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote: >>>>>>> On Fri, 4 May 2018 18:54:04 +0300 >>>>>>> Radu Pirea wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Added geometry description for Microchip 25LC256 memory. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Same as for the dataflash stuff you posted a few weeks ago: I >>>>>>> don't >>>>>>> think this device belongs in the SPI NOR framework. >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Boris, >>>>>> >>>>>> 25lc256 memory is similar with mr25h256, the only difference is the >>>>>> page size(64 vs 256). Because mr25h256 is already in SPI NOR >>>>>> framework >>>>>> I added here 25lc256. >>>>> >>>>> I think I must be reading the wrong datasheet, but can you show me >>>>> how >>>>> does it support things like READID opcode ? >>>>> >>>> Hi Marek, >>>> >>>> I read the datasheet for 25lc256 and for mr25h256 and none of them >>>> supports READID. Is this required for a chip to be included in spi-nor >>>> framework? I just followed the mr25h256 as an example. >>> >>> So I thought until you pointed out the MR25 devices. >>> >>> Does the 25LC device need erase or not ? I think the MR25s didn't, but I >>> might be wrong. >> >> You are right. MR25s does not need erase and the same thing is true for >> 25LC. > > Oh. And the command set is (except for readid) comparable to SPI NOR ? > >>> Maybe the framework could support the 25LC afterall. >>> >> Yes, this was my impression too. > > I am still thinking that the AT25 driver might be a better fit for such > devices. Can you take a look ? I tested the memory with at25 driver and it works with no line changed in driver. :) >