From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF73BC83F14 for ; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 07:42:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=+lVNozbVyzZGJRDhYNis3yjU/0YFikNya4LPVocSzwQ=; b=nKChRZEIUpG3KK BcuoEWFFATrtSVZsAqm933CEVR+Epwn38Hfe0XKgEHgUCsj+S/9gWfAOmUNrVw6EytK/Jv34BXz+p BkwucIpNq+XWbDLvg4f7NE3QWcrur46fGVnzjbIKDZsRgGMyJu8+Hjf6VqFBHcTZ+Au2Bl/ODRkQt lm2QT39Kna1mDCJvq/qtBsClopknaMkmOSftsmeXF3E5qnk4LQ0JbJC6vPJN+vTiDNrzRpoxAbp2U q/1NRPXSRR/D2wtw7mSPJs1r3c4U+FgDcW+h8xRVthNjT3UqAz4j9ekGIZSTAi7DpO36Ll5LRjiC1 DYHj6XS4QZ0aBsRHjasA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qatMg-00AxUI-1A; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 07:42:18 +0000 Received: from out-249.mta1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:203:375::f9]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1qatMc-00AxQl-1z for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Aug 2023 07:42:16 +0000 Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1693294923; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=kzCYK+m1dXoYq1GdX9wRq/xLcjMjzBwHZbogX1zaiXI=; b=wx9qXfUOb6FlguPiqwy6R82+yQxWta9+fR66YAQ2/1ZdnqJnQPp1kHU4jR8nRlngim3iOe HThmnzNEUSaEuQwHiVi+WxF88JyUG2K+H0WcvTm70cW04LSIUXyP6AZ74VPb7aBxP9rojs L1LrBvpa76A1LVLwfY5LHU6MjnCVZUs= Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:41:43 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] xfs: add NOWAIT semantics for readdir Content-Language: en-US To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: io-uring@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe , Dominique Martinet , Pavel Begunkov , Christian Brauner , Alexander Viro , Stefan Roesch , Clay Harris , Dave Chinner , "Darrick J . Wong" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-cachefs@redhat.com, ecryptfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, devel@lists.orangefs.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, samba-technical@lists.samba.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Wanpeng Li References: <20230827132835.1373581-1-hao.xu@linux.dev> <20230827132835.1373581-3-hao.xu@linux.dev> X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Hao Xu In-Reply-To: X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20230829_004214_821849_7F30F7AC X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 26.66 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 8/28/23 04:44, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sun, Aug 27, 2023 at 09:28:26PM +0800, Hao Xu wrote: >> +++ b/fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_da_btree.c >> @@ -2643,16 +2643,32 @@ xfs_da_read_buf( >> struct xfs_buf_map map, *mapp = ↦ >> int nmap = 1; >> int error; >> + int buf_flags = 0; >> >> *bpp = NULL; >> error = xfs_dabuf_map(dp, bno, flags, whichfork, &mapp, &nmap); >> if (error || !nmap) >> goto out_free; >> >> + /* >> + * NOWAIT semantics mean we don't wait on the buffer lock nor do we >> + * issue IO for this buffer if it is not already in memory. Caller will >> + * retry. This will return -EAGAIN if the buffer is in memory and cannot >> + * be locked, and no buffer and no error if it isn't in memory. We >> + * translate both of those into a return state of -EAGAIN and *bpp = >> + * NULL. >> + */ > > I would not include this comment. No strong comment here, since this patch is mostly from Dave, it's better if Dave can ack this. > >> + if (flags & XFS_DABUF_NOWAIT) >> + buf_flags |= XBF_TRYLOCK | XBF_INCORE; >> error = xfs_trans_read_buf_map(mp, tp, mp->m_ddev_targp, mapp, nmap, 0, >> &bp, ops); > > what tsting did you do with this? Because you don't actually _use_ > buf_flags anywhere in this patch (presumably they should be the > sixth argument to xfs_trans_read_buf_map() instead of 0). So I can only > conclude that either you didn't test, or your testing was inadequate. > The tests I've done are listed in the cover-letter, this one is missed, the tricky place is it's hard to get this kind of mistake since it runs well without nowait logic...I'll fix it in next version. >> if (error) >> goto out_free; >> + if (!bp) { >> + ASSERT(flags & XFS_DABUF_NOWAIT); > > I don't think this ASSERT is appropriate. > >> @@ -391,10 +401,17 @@ xfs_dir2_leaf_getdents( >> bp = NULL; >> } >> >> - if (*lock_mode == 0) >> - *lock_mode = xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(dp); >> + if (*lock_mode == 0) { >> + *lock_mode = >> + xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_generic(dp, >> + ctx->flags & DIR_CONTEXT_F_NOWAIT); >> + if (!*lock_mode) { >> + error = -EAGAIN; >> + break; >> + } >> + } > > 'generic' doesn't seem like a great suffix to mean 'takes nowait flag'. > And this is far too far indented. > > xfs_dir2_lock(dp, ctx, lock_mode); > > with: > > STATIC void xfs_dir2_lock(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct dir_context *ctx, > unsigned int lock_mode) > { > if (*lock_mode) > return; > if (ctx->flags & DIR_CONTEXT_F_NOWAIT) > return xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_nowait(dp); > return xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(dp); > } > > ... which I think you can use elsewhere in this patch (reformat it to > XFS coding style, of course). And then you don't need > xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_generic(). > How about rename xfs_ilock_data_map_shared() to xfs_ilock_data_map_block() and rename xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_generic() to xfs_ilock_data_map_shared()? STATIC void xfs_ilock_data_map_shared(struct xfs_inode *dp, struct dir_context *ctx, unsigned int lock_mode) { if (*lock_mode) return; if (ctx->flags & DIR_CONTEXT_F_NOWAIT) return xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_nowait(dp); return xfs_ilock_data_map_shared_block(dp); } ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/