public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
	Michal Suchanek <hramrach@gmail.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/5] improve mtdpart robustness
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 13:06:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1438340815.git.hramrach@gmail.com> (raw)

Hello,

this is v2 series following the discussion about conflict between s3c64xx and
ofpart.

I tried loading some fabricated ofpart partitions and it appears to work
reasonably.

ofpart assigns partition numbers backwards from bottom to top but that's
probably not something to be concerned about. Sorting partitions by offset
would be nice but that's way beyond just making the two drivers not conflict.

Thanks

Michal

Michal Suchanek (5):
  mtd: mtdpart: add debug prints to partition parser.
  mtd: mtdpart: Do not fail mtd probe when parsing partitions fails.
  mtd: ofpart: update devicetree binding specification
  mtd: ofpart: document the lock flag.
  mtd: ofpart: move ofpart partitions to a dedicated dt node

 .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/partition.txt          | 69 +++++++++++++---------
 drivers/mtd/mtdpart.c                              | 14 ++++-
 drivers/mtd/ofpart.c                               | 56 +++++++++++++-----
 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)

-- 
2.1.4

             reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31 11:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-31 11:06 Michal Suchanek [this message]
2015-07-30  8:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] mtd: ofpart: update devicetree binding specification Michal Suchanek
2015-07-30 10:10 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] mtd: ofpart: move ofpart partitions to a dedicated dt node Michal Suchanek
2015-07-31 16:06   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 16:52     ` Michal Suchanek
2015-07-31 17:24       ` Boris Brezillon
2015-07-31 22:32         ` Michal Suchanek
2015-07-30 10:19 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] mtd: ofpart: document the lock flag Michal Suchanek
2015-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] mtd: mtdpart: Do not fail mtd probe when parsing partitions fails Michal Suchanek
2015-07-31 11:19 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] mtd: mtdpart: add debug prints to partition parser Michal Suchanek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1438340815.git.hramrach@gmail.com \
    --to=hramrach@gmail.com \
    --cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=galak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox