From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailout.micron.com ([137.201.242.129]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.87 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1cyfQk-0002WA-7O for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:09:04 +0000 From: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" To: Boris Brezillon CC: Thomas Petazzoni , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "pawel.moll@arm.com" , Campbell , "richard@nod.at" , "Mark Rutland" , "marek.vasut@gmail.com" , Rob Herring , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "galak@codeaurora.org" , Cyrille Pitchen , "computersforpeace@gmail.com" Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/5] mtd: nand: add support for Micron on-die ECC Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:08:17 +0000 Message-ID: References: <538805ebf8e64015a8b833de755652b3@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> <8a171dacd20c45bd8285ecc5dbe8854a@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> <20170322144507.4d80d2cc@bbrezillon> <0dccc0abcf234e98be6d340027cf1a30@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> <20170322155216.319efc3e@bbrezillon> <414dd35931814ce38381a251917ad79f@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> <20170411145102.563fa388@bbrezillon> <90300f14cd2a4ae6967d8be0f7dff4e9@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> <20170411173051.7aafb717@bbrezillon> <5a96e73ef951414a82c01b67088b24d3@SIWEX5A.sing.micron.com> <20170412090313.539f81b2@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20170412090313.539f81b2@bbrezillon> Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, Boris >One last question. Is it dangerous to call >SET_FEATURE(disable/enable-ECC) on a NAND that has ECC enabled by default? >We could use that to detect whether on-die ECC can be turned off or not an= d >adjust the chip->ecc init steps accordingly. > No any danger exist, NAND just gives response that set feature failed. Also, it is a good solution to detect whether on-die ECC support or not thr= ough SET_FEATURE(disable/enable-ECC) successful or not. >Thanks, > >Boris Happy Easter! //Bean