From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from rproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.170.192]) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DVTHh-0006ih-HG for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 10 May 2005 07:52:22 -0400 Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id y7so1043484rne for ; Tue, 10 May 2005 04:52:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 17:22:26 +0530 From: Niraj Maheshwari To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: SUMMARY patch for JFFS2 Reply-To: Niraj Maheshwari List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I am using Intel NOR flash having a 5.5 MB parition specific for JFFS2. I have enabled the JFFS2 SUMMARY option after applying the patch from the below website on latest MTD for JFFS2 only. http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/jffs2/mount.php Flash is completely erased and i am trying to mount this by using=20 mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock0 tmp/ It gets mounted..and then i completely full this partition ( 5.5 MB) with data... then i remove few of the files from this partition..then i do a sync. In the next reboot, i get to see lot of error while mounting this parition. jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x00270020: 0x00b0 instead jffs2_scan_eraseblock(): Magic bitmask 0x1985 not found at 0x00270024: 0x00b0 instead Further such events for this erase block will not be printed=20 Am i doing some mistake as i guess SUMMARY patch must have been completely tested for NOR flash as mentioned in the site. I am having the same problem when i try to use SUMMARY in JFFS3.=20 If you could help me out to resolve this problem then it would be great. Thanks Niraj