From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
To: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>,
linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] mtd/powerpc: Remove unused "device-width" property
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2009 00:01:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fa686aa40904112301q6bcdd23enc23c745b6198a447@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200904071854.16818.sr@denx.de>
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 April 2009, Scott Wood wrote:
>> Stefan Roese wrote:
>> > This property is unused. It's not handled as all by the physmap_of
>> > driver. So let's remove it from the documentation.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Stefan Roese <sr@denx.de>
>> > CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
>>
>> The device tree describes the hardware, not what Linux happens to do
>> with it at the moment.
>>
>> I'd rather keep it.
>
> I find it rather confusing to "see" such bindings that are not supported. One
> could expect something to happen/change after defining this property. So in
> general I think adding unsupported properties to the Documentation is a bad
> idea. But that's just my 2 cents. If the general opinion is to keep this
> property, I'll keep it in of course.
I say keep it. It is a valid way to describe the hardware regardless
of whether or not the driver supports it yet.
g.
--
Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-12 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-07 8:39 [PATCH 3/4 v2] mtd/powerpc: Remove unused "device-width" property Stefan Roese
2009-04-07 16:42 ` Scott Wood
2009-04-07 16:54 ` Stefan Roese
2009-04-12 6:01 ` Grant Likely [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fa686aa40904112301q6bcdd23enc23c745b6198a447@mail.gmail.com \
--to=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=scottwood@freescale.com \
--cc=sr@denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox