From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DJFd1-0005On-1n for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 14:51:51 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DJFZY-0008Ue-CX for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:48:22 +0200 Received: from halhoupro3.halliburton.com ([64.154.26.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:48:16 +0200 Received: from sergei.sharonov by halhoupro3.halliburton.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:48:16 +0200 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org From: Sergei Sharonov Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 18:47:22 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: news Subject: long umount time List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, I sometimes see excessively long umount times (40-60 s) with jffs2/nand. The platform is a custom at91rm9200 board running linux 2.6.10 with mtd snapshot from 3/28/2005. Umount is from busybox. The umount time varies but the system is mostly idle during it unlike during mount. After a few operations with filesystem it goes away until sometime later. Has anybody seen that? Sergei Sharonov