public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sergei Sharonov <sergei.sharonov@halliburton.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: mounting jffs2
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 20:39:14 +0000 (UTC)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20050414T222445-494@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1113400225.23175.9.camel@sauron.oktetlabs.ru

Hi

> Believe me, if you'll write in 4K chunks, you'll effect much better
> JFFS2 performance. 

200 MByte file written on a 256 MByte NAND in 4096 byte chunks instead of 1024.
It is somewhat better (?) but still unusable. Mount time is still at 1m31s, 
but any operation after that including ls or touch are 10-14 minutes and
have inconsistent real time, sys is ~6m25s.
BTW, does it make difference if I run test on pristine, freshly
erased flash or after I created and deleted a few large files?

# time mount /mnt/flash/

real    1m31.304s
user    0m0.020s
sys     1m31.199s
# time touch /mnt/flash/test1

real    14m23.449s
user    0m0.010s
sys     6m24.856s
# umount /mnt/flash/
# time mount /mnt/flash/

real    1m31.306s
user    0m0.010s
sys     1m31.219s
# time touch /mnt/flash/test1

real    10m48.944s
user    0m0.000s
sys     6m25.156s
#
# umount /mnt/flash/
# time mount /mnt/flash/

real    1m31.300s
user    0m0.010s
sys     1m31.239s
# time touch /mnt/flash/test1

real    14m30.499s
user    0m0.000s
sys     6m24.746s
#

I will try next 10 x 20 MByte files but am afraid there is no
quick fix here.

Sergei Sharonov

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-04-14 20:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-04-13 13:25 mounting jffs2 Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-13 13:50 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-13 14:22   ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-13 15:02     ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-13 17:51       ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-14  8:41         ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-14 12:39           ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-14 13:11             ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-14 14:15               ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-14 15:18                 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-13 15:18     ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-14 20:39   ` Sergei Sharonov [this message]
2005-04-14  9:01 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-04-14  9:15   ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-20 14:59     ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-20 15:20       ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-20 16:34         ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-21  7:48       ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-21 14:30       ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-04-21 15:31         ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-26 13:35           ` Zoltan Sogor
2005-04-26 13:51             ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-27  9:39               ` Zoltan Sogor
2005-04-21 15:34         ` Sergei Sharonov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=loom.20050414T222445-494@post.gmane.org \
    --to=sergei.sharonov@halliburton.com \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox