From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DOGle-0000uE-IM for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 11:05:31 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DOGhB-0003ts-Cg for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:00:53 +0200 Received: from halhoupro3.halliburton.com ([64.154.26.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:00:53 +0200 Received: from sergei.sharonov by halhoupro3.halliburton.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 17:00:53 +0200 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org From: Sergei Sharonov Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 14:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <425E3174.4030308@inf.u-szeged.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: news Subject: Re: mounting jffs2 List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, > > Just an idea: you may try out our summary patch. ( > > http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/jffs2/mount.php ) > Yes, summary will help greatly with mount time, but unfortunately it > doesn't help with memory consumption and iget() (in Sergey's case the time > of the background checking is the same). Hmm.. then what improvement does summary patch provide? In my case mount returns in 1.5 minutes but then I cannot do anything to flash for another 20+ minutes. Sergei Sharonov