From: Sergei Sharonov <sergei.sharonov@halliburton.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: mounting jffs2
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2005 15:34:12 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20050421T171656-701@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4267B8EF.6000803@inf.u-szeged.hu
Hi,
> Anyway, we are now working on a new boot time speed up technique. We
> call it centralized summary. The "old" summary is erase block summary.
..................
> If you would like to test it I can send a patch. I would be also useful
> for us, because we don't have real NAND device, so we cannot make real
> measurements. (Forutnatelly we can use Artem's NAND simulator.)
Ferenc, I appreciate your help. Unfortunately I don't think the patch will
improve my situation since I need to handle un-clean umounts. e.g. power
failures and still preserve reasonable mount time.
I did a few tests with yaffs1 and yaffs2. With yaffs1, 128 MByte NAND and 100
MBytes worth of files I am getting 18 s mount time. And after 18 s filesystem
seems to be fully operational (touch, ls -l, etc.) Treat data as
preliminary since I just built yaffs1 yesterday ;-)
I also did write/read/verify/erase of total of 6.8 GBytes of data without any
errors. Have not done any power fail testing yet.
Now, the bad news yaffs2 did not work for me - files would disapear or get
corrupted. I would need yaffs2 to handle devices with 2 kB page size.
Sergei Sharonov
prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-21 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-04-13 13:25 mounting jffs2 Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-13 13:50 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-13 14:22 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-13 15:02 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-13 17:51 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-14 8:41 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-14 12:39 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-14 13:11 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-14 14:15 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-14 15:18 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-13 15:18 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-14 20:39 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-14 9:01 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-04-14 9:15 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-20 14:59 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-20 15:20 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-20 16:34 ` Sergei Sharonov
2005-04-21 7:48 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-21 14:30 ` Ferenc Havasi
2005-04-21 15:31 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-26 13:35 ` Zoltan Sogor
2005-04-26 13:51 ` Artem B. Bityuckiy
2005-04-27 9:39 ` Zoltan Sogor
2005-04-21 15:34 ` Sergei Sharonov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20050421T171656-701@post.gmane.org \
--to=sergei.sharonov@halliburton.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox