From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by canuck.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.43 #1 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1DjH0Y-0003N8-Uc for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 09:35:44 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1DjGuZ-0000Dk-7G for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:29:37 +0200 Received: from halhoupro3.halliburton.com ([64.154.26.251]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:29:31 +0200 Received: from sergei.sharonov by halhoupro3.halliburton.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Jun 2005 15:29:31 +0200 To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org From: Sergei Sharonov Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:28:46 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <42B2BAE3.7040709@anagramm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: news Subject: Re: I2C FRAM List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Hi, > For I2C related stuff please have a look at the lm_sensors project at > http://secure.netroedge.com/~lm78/ Thanks, man. Yea, I've see that page. > There are generic drivers for the widely used I2C eeproms which you > can use/modify/... for several platforms. > Please check the documentation there. It looks like it is geared more towards sensors and really small eeproms. I thought that FRAM would be more on line with MTD. I was/am hoping to use FRAM for a transaction log and possibly do a bit of buffering for NAND. Sergei