From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org)
	by pentafluge.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.63 #1 (Red Hat Linux))
	id 1HTMZQ-0003rf-Mg
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:27:02 +0000
Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43)
	id 1HTMXL-0008HD-Ta
	for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:24:51 +0100
Received: from office.ubiquisys.com ([88.96.204.222])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:24:51 +0100
Received: from mw_phil by office.ubiquisys.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>; Mon, 19 Mar 2007 19:24:51 +0100
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
From: MikeW <mw_phil@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Strange automatic GC threshold ?
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:23:59 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <loom.20070319T192034-88@post.gmane.org>
References: <1174321009.26465.266.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se>
	<loom.20070319T174627-836@post.gmane.org>
	<1174323834.30079.16.camel@zod.rchland.ibm.com>
	<1174324903.26465.274.camel@gentoo-jocke.transmode.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: news <news@sea.gmane.org>
List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list <linux-mtd.lists.infradead.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd>,
	<mailto:linux-mtd-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>

Joakim Tjernlund <joakim.tjernlund <at> transmode.se> writes:

> 
> On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 12:03 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> How about thinking about the orginal question that made me send this
> mail in the first place before sending any patches? :)
> 
>  Jocke
> 

Hey sorry - I thought there was meant to be a benefit of the "many eyes"
open source code checking, and was adding in some code resilience,
since you had drawn my attention to those few lines !!

Regards,
MikeW