From: MikeW <mw_phil@yahoo.co.uk>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: Wanted - simple NOR Flash filing system
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 16:03:53 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20070424T174804-792@post.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200704240655.37619.manningc2@actrix.gen.nz
Charles Manning <manningc2 <at> actrix.gen.nz> writes:
>
> On Monday 23 April 2007 23:34, MikeW wrote:
> > For storing a few tens/hundreds of bytes of configuration data,
> > in a handful of files (no subdirs), read access 99.99%,
> > write/update once or twice in life of the system.
> > Fits into single erase block ideally, so might need to hold data in RAM
> > pending erase - if ever filled the block !
> >
> > Any suggestions ?
>
> It is far too grand to call this a file system.
> This is a bit more like a linear file store, or even more proimitive than
> that.
>
> I agree with the basic principle: if you don't need a full fs, then why use
> one? You don't need a chainsaw to cut butter!
>
> I have done stuff like this numerous times, but don't have any OSS code to
> release.
>
> The last time I did this, I used a pretty simple system that just used records
> of the form:
>
> Header byte
> 2 byte Length
> Validity byte (0xFF not set up, 0x0F= in use, 0x03 = deleted
> Name
> data (length - (strlen(name) + 1 + 1 + 1))
>
> With this mechanism you could only write a whole "file". No append/overwrite
> etc. Just rewrite the whole record.
>
> To delete a file you just set the validity byte accordingly.
>
> I had two blocks and when the one got full I would do "garbage collection",
> copying the valid "files" through to the new block. With one block you could
> store the stuff in RAM.
>
Thanks - I have certainly thought before about implementing
such a simple scheme,
but I was wondering if there was already an tested 'off-the'shelf'
set of code since it seems to be such a basic requirement if you don't
want or need JFFS2 size, functionality or overhead.
I have had a direct email (imcd) suggesting storing a tar file directly in
the /dev/mtd, but would prefer that any 'driver' was self-sufficient
so it could potentially be used before kernel boot.
"tarfs", anyone ?
>> (from imcd)
Save:
tar cz -f /dev/mtdblock/1 -C dir .
Load:
tar xz -f /dev/mtdblock/1 -C dir
<<
For now I have made do with a single block romfs device created 'offline',
though in principle I could create the required files in /tmp and then
load them into the erased flash block using genromfs.
Regards,
MikeW
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-24 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 11:34 Wanted - simple NOR Flash filing system MikeW
2007-04-23 18:55 ` Charles Manning
2007-04-24 16:03 ` MikeW [this message]
2007-04-27 7:49 ` David H. Lynch Jr.
2007-04-26 14:09 ` Wanted - simple NOR Flash filing system - JFFS2 ? MikeW
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20070424T174804-792@post.gmane.org \
--to=mw_phil@yahoo.co.uk \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox