From: David Wuertele <dave+gmane@wuertele.com>
To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Performance effect of mounting jffs2 via mtdblock
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 19:26:33 +0000 (UTC) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <loom.20100623T212106-800@post.gmane.org> (raw)
Reading http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/faq/jffs2.html, it says that jffs2
can be mounted with or without the mtdblock driver. Eg:
mount -t jffs2 mtd2 /foo
vs
mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock2 /foo
I'm wondering what is the difference between these two methods with respect to
performance?
Thanks,
Dave
next reply other threads:[~2010-06-23 19:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-23 19:26 David Wuertele [this message]
2010-07-08 9:11 ` Performance effect of mounting jffs2 via mtdblock Artem Bityutskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=loom.20100623T212106-800@post.gmane.org \
--to=dave+gmane@wuertele.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).