public inbox for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ebiederman@lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] refactoring MTD cmdset ops, jedec_probe, and cfi_probe
Date: 13 Jul 2004 01:05:49 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m33c3widyq.fsf@maxwell.lnxi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1089699909.8822.9.camel@imladris.demon.co.uk>

David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> writes:

> On Mon, 2004-07-12 at 21:13 -0600, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > I would like to have the probe functions fill in
> > not the CmdSet number but a structure full of function pointers.
> > And of course the upper layers need to be modified to cope.
> 
> > I have both Intel and AMD chips to test against.  CFI and non CFI
> > all being used as motherboard BIOS chips.  So I should be able
> > to catch the vast majority of problems in testing.  All but the
> > delicate chip interleave case, but I should not actually be touching
> > that part of the code, and at least I am aware of the issue.
> 
> And I just rewrote that part of the code too :)

That part does not look to bad...

Although there has been some error handling from cfi_cmdset_0002.c which
disturbs me.  Seeing as I'm good at finding flaky NOR flash parts...
 
> > Does anyone have any problems with this refactoring?
> 
> No, it seems like a good idea. It'll let us drop half of cfi_cmdset_0020
> too.
> 
> Once I've done some testing on the new interleave / map access code I
> was planning to send an update to Linus this week. That _really_ needs
> to happen this week, so if you're going to do this then either do it
> today, or wait a month. Personally I favour the former -- the whole
> thing needs testing now anyway.
> 
> Can you get to #mtd on irc.freenode.net?


I can do that, although tomorrow is a little busy.  IRC isn't my best medium.

I'm just winding down for bed so and won't be back for 8 hours or so.  It
looks like we both have some definite ideas so a quick chat might be helpful.

That time line is a bit challenging.  My safe guess was about a week to get
everything written and tested... 

Anyway I will do what I can.  I don't want to even think about how
complex a network I had to setup to get IPv6 going behind our firewall
at work this morning.    I stopped waiting for the sysadmins to set
things up properly....

Anyway see you in a couple of hours.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-13  7:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-07-13  3:13 [RFC] refactoring MTD cmdset ops, jedec_probe, and cfi_probe Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13  6:25 ` David Woodhouse
2004-07-13  7:05   ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2004-07-13  8:02     ` David Woodhouse
2004-07-13 14:23       ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 14:45         ` Thayne Harbaugh
2004-07-13 15:04           ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 15:21             ` Thayne Harbaugh
2004-07-13 15:40               ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 16:00               ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-14  5:44                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-08-12  7:39                   ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 15:25   ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-07-13 16:17     ` Josh Boyer
2004-08-12  7:13       ` Eric W. Biederman
2004-08-16 14:13         ` Josh Boyer
2004-07-13 16:36 ` Dan Post
2004-07-13 16:52   ` Nicolas Pitre
2004-07-13 17:33     ` Dan Post
2004-07-13 18:17       ` Nicolas Pitre

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m33c3widyq.fsf@maxwell.lnxi.com \
    --to=ebiederman@lnxi.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox