* PIIX flashing woes with SST29EE010
@ 2002-04-04 0:52 Jeremy Jackson
2002-04-04 1:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Jackson @ 2002-04-04 0:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linuxbios, linux-mtd
(crossposted)
FYI,
A problem I was having that *appeared* to be a problem with
getting writes to the flash chip, wasn't
It turns out that SST's datasheet for SST29EE010 is incorrect.
It turns out that the part I have *doesn't* respond to "new" style
ID mode entry sequence, as indicated in the manual.
It only responds to the "old" AA 55 80 AA 55 60 sequence.
I should have a generic PIIX map driver for MTD soon now.
Jeremy
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PIIX flashing woes with SST29EE010
2002-04-04 0:52 PIIX flashing woes with SST29EE010 Jeremy Jackson
@ 2002-04-04 1:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-04-04 1:23 ` Jeremy Jackson
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Eric W. Biederman @ 2002-04-04 1:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Jackson; +Cc: linuxbios, linux-mtd
"Jeremy Jackson" <jerj@coplanar.net> writes:
> (crossposted)
> FYI,
>
> A problem I was having that *appeared* to be a problem with
> getting writes to the flash chip, wasn't
>
> It turns out that SST's datasheet for SST29EE010 is incorrect.
> It turns out that the part I have *doesn't* respond to "new" style
> ID mode entry sequence, as indicated in the manual.
> It only responds to the "old" AA 55 80 AA 55 60 sequence.
>
> I should have a generic PIIX map driver for MTD soon now.
So does jedec_probe work for you or do you need to patch it?
Eric
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: PIIX flashing woes with SST29EE010
2002-04-04 1:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
@ 2002-04-04 1:23 ` Jeremy Jackson
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Jackson @ 2002-04-04 1:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Eric W. Biederman; +Cc: linuxbios, linux-mtd
No I will need to patch it.
I have been reading through
the source code of a DOS based flash utility, Uniflash (Pascal)
and it's probe routine appears to use both methods.
(it tries old method first BTW)
It works well (under DOS/FreeDOS) and supports a
surprising variety of chips and southbridges.
That's where I got the idea to try the old method.
I was just using an homemade one to try and figure out
what the problem was. I'm looking at integrating it right
now.
Jeremy
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederman@lnxi.com>
To: "Jeremy Jackson" <jerj@coplanar.net>
Cc: <linuxbios@lanl.gov>; <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: PIIX flashing woes with SST29EE010
> "Jeremy Jackson" <jerj@coplanar.net> writes:
>
> > (crossposted)
> > FYI,
> >
> > A problem I was having that *appeared* to be a problem with
> > getting writes to the flash chip, wasn't
> >
> > It turns out that SST's datasheet for SST29EE010 is incorrect.
> > It turns out that the part I have *doesn't* respond to "new" style
> > ID mode entry sequence, as indicated in the manual.
> > It only responds to the "old" AA 55 80 AA 55 60 sequence.
> >
> > I should have a generic PIIX map driver for MTD soon now.
>
>
> So does jedec_probe work for you or do you need to patch it?
>
> Eric
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-04 1:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-04 0:52 PIIX flashing woes with SST29EE010 Jeremy Jackson
2002-04-04 1:11 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-04-04 1:23 ` Jeremy Jackson
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox