From: ebiederman@lnxi.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Q: interleave logic?
Date: 03 May 2001 13:04:49 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m38zketfse.fsf@DLT.linuxnetworx.com> (raw)
What do we have nasty half incomplete interleave
logic all throughout the cfi code?
It looks like it could be done more cleanly with a wrapper
around the probe code, and a wrapper around the mapping driver.
Eric
next reply other threads:[~2001-05-03 19:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-03 19:04 Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2001-05-03 21:43 ` Q: interleave logic? David Woodhouse
2001-05-04 1:41 ` Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m38zketfse.fsf@DLT.linuxnetworx.com \
--to=ebiederman@lnxi.com \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox