From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86FF9C4345F for ; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:20:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References :In-Reply-To:Subject:Cc:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=4BSzo8o+755KHsuVC0aZuBk3efU+yJfSJbJ7ZpSQNNk=; b=m7xxj/bxCdN18w zK2me1nL7vy6D9JWbosQLcZkiol9+k4GzvSnMZnav/q1nsNyxbkrubUfO7Se5OYu5nFqC9S2sMxz/ +HkTsEcLAIcKht8a2l5UpyqHOb7fLT7nlzoEPkzpl6pFuVcXFvv9SDPtYUx+nbXadmS29YGvWHzFF jVB83q7rtbd/xevp/hiywiuZgvaENam9DW5u3UbcPvIVKGVoXtkbMCar7in6Ju4DjoFhGfQIJfHas GANneRExpO5pXS8rVneUEKWg4MtblfZmYWgHBZlUrTkaV1AeNzu1GbmYAl+RVMCvrq8RASE/ERaEQ 33XU/QhDhlvxRHb4ampw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxPoJ-00000001yOe-1n4q; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:20:11 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.97.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rxPoG-00000001yO3-1zzW for linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:20:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6232617DC; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:20:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E862DC2BD11; Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:20:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1713439207; bh=pTH4AMFIX/a1mvllVA9nEz2QdISSpNcl3msKV0Ms2qE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=skBB0CGxR8U4BMU3oTyatlqb+Ux82gAo1aQ91iF9dBoWU+MxdKF360YJOFinq+Clp 09Hr9I3Gx6k8kOiUdpttSRQEZuEwPAff4N2g39HYYsqay39X9GNlwwizN1pVkU/b/T zZdGelMgN5wIyfq9oi92tjVvsNcyr22i+aznxes++L7lPJHUBz4eWEm9AKSl+rFBMA K5YpqSDFXOO+dpnYjnpUIgsJokRR8HlfchHOtjgixQ36yinzCrM79G1+O5k7SDbxdO vcUiQKf1EqcN39oS4XzPtoV4VdKbMak7kJjd2dooXFnX7whHqO9YZ8rkJhPbfzfn2v ewcREo8XVKPog== From: Pratyush Yadav To: "Michael Walle" Cc: "Pratyush Yadav" , "Tudor Ambarus" , "Miquel Raynal" , "Richard Weinberger" , "Vignesh Raghavendra" , , Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 6/6] mtd: spi-nor: introduce support for displaying deprecation message In-Reply-To: (Michael Walle's message of "Thu, 18 Apr 2024 11:57:27 +0200") References: <20240412134405.381832-1-mwalle@kernel.org> <20240412134405.381832-7-mwalle@kernel.org> Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2024 13:20:04 +0200 Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20240418_042008_583046_CD9C3656 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.53 ) X-BeenThere: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux MTD discussion mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-mtd" Errors-To: linux-mtd-bounces+linux-mtd=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Apr 18 2024, Michael Walle wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 5:52 PM CEST, Pratyush Yadav wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 17 2024, Michael Walle wrote: >> > On Wed Apr 17, 2024 at 4:36 PM CEST, Pratyush Yadav wrote: [...] >> >> I like the idea in general. Do you think we should also print a rough >> >> date for the deprecation as well? >> > >> > Might make sense, any suggestions? >> >> How about a simple string to flash_info? > > Ahh, I was rather asking if you already had a time frame in mind. > > Besides that, should it be a date or a (future) kernel version? > Roughly about two/three kernel releases? I think kernel version is better. I don't base this on any real data, only on gut feeling, but I think three kernel releases is a good time. Should add up to about 6-7 months. [...] -- Regards, Pratyush Yadav ______________________________________________________ Linux MTD discussion mailing list http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/