Re: [PATCH RFC] ubifs: Fix use-after-free in ubifs_tnc_end_commit

[Waqar Hameed <waqar.hameed@axis.com>]

On Wed, Oct 16, 2024 at 10:11 +0800 Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com> wrote:

[...]

> BTW, what is the configuration of your flash?(eg. erase size, page size)?

$ mtdinfo /dev/mtd2
  mtd2
  Name:                           firmware
  Type:                           nand
  Eraseblock size:                131072 bytes, 128.0 KiB
  Amount of eraseblocks:          1832 (240123904 bytes, 229.0 MiB)
  Minimum input/output unit size: 2048 bytes
  Sub-page size:                  2048 bytes
  OOB size:                       64 bytes
  Character device major/minor:   90:4
  Bad blocks are allowed:         true
  Device is writable:             true

$ ubinfo /dev/ubi0_0
  Volume ID:   0 (on ubi0)
  Type:        dynamic
  Alignment:   1
  Size:        661 LEBs (83931136 bytes, 80.0 MiB)
  State:       OK
  Name:        test-vol
  Character device major/minor: 244:1

[...]

> Well, let's do a preliminary analysis.
> The znode->cparent[znode->ciip] is a freed address in write_index(), which
> means:
> 1. 'znode->ciip' is valid, znode->cparent is freed by tnc_delete, however znode
> cannot be freed if znode->cnext is not NULL, which means:
>   a) 'znode->cparent' is not dirty, we should add an assertion like
>   ubifs_assert(c, ubifs_zn_dirty(znode->cparent)) in get_znodes_to_commit().
>   Note, please check that 'znode->cparent' is not NULL before the assertion.
>   b) 'znode->cparent' is dirty, but it is not added into list 'c->cnext', we
>   should traverse the entire TNC in get_znodes_to_commit() to make sure that all
>   dirty znodes are collected into list 'c->cnext', so another assertion is
>  needed.
> 2. 'znode->ciip' is invalid, and the value beyonds the memory area of
> znode->cparent. All znodes are allocated with size of 'c->max_znode_sz', which
> means that 'znode->ciip' exceeds the 'c->fantout', so we can add an assertion
> like ubifs_assert(c, znode->ciip < c->fantout) in get_znodes_to_commit().
>
> That's what I can think of, are there any other possibilities?

I looked a little more at `get_znodes_to_commit()` when adding the
asserts you suggest, and I have a question: what happens when
`find_next_dirty()` returns `NULL`? In that case

```
znode->cnext = c->cnext;
```

but `znode->cparent` and `znode->ciip` are not updated. Shouldn't they?

By the way, I left a test running, and it actually triggered the same
KASAN report after 800 iterations... So we now at least know that this
patch doesn't indeed fix the problem.

I also found another minor thing regarding the update of `cnt` in
`get_znodes_to_commit`. I'll send a separate patch for that.

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/