From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paul Cercueil" <paul.cercueil@bootlin.com>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
"Bharat Bhushan" <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
"Sunil Kovvuri Goutham" <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
"Tanmay Jagdale" <tanmay@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for panic writes
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 15:57:32 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-171505@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261014154301.157755-4-paul.cercueil@bootlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] mtd: spi-nor: kmalloc/kfree during panic write causes deadlock
--
commit 3bd35bd5922a50a6d084d4da3c21aebcee2351cd
Author: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@marvell.com>
mtd: spi-nor: Add support for panic writes
This commit introduces the functionality for SPI NOR controllers to perform
panic writes. It attempts to bypass locked mutexes and sleep operations
when doing a panic write, since preemption and IRQs are disabled.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 58257cc21c681..d5e572287bb73 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -2203,7 +2242,8 @@ static int spi_nor_octal_dtr_write(struct spi_nor *nor, loff_t to, size_t len,
> if (IS_ALIGNED(to, 2) && IS_ALIGNED(len, 2))
> return spi_nor_write_data(nor, to, len, buf);
>
> - tmp_buf = kmalloc(nor->params->page_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> + tmp_buf = kmalloc(nor->params->page_size,
> + nor->mtd.oops_panic_write ? GFP_ATOMIC : GFP_KERNEL);
[Severity: High]
Can this kmalloc() call in spi_nor_octal_dtr_write(), and the subsequent
kfree(), cause a deadlock during a panic?
While GFP_ATOMIC prevents the scheduler from sleeping or reclaiming memory,
the SLUB/SLAB memory allocator still fundamentally relies on raw spinlocks
(e.g., kmem_cache_node->list_lock or pcp->lock) for its freelists.
Since spi_nor_panic_write() is invoked in a panic context where local
interrupts are disabled and all other CPUs have been forcibly halted, if
any halted CPU happened to be holding a slab lock at the moment of the
crash, the panicking CPU will spin indefinitely waiting for it.
Should this panic path rely on a pre-allocated buffer (such as
nor->bouncebuf) instead to guarantee the panic dump can be written?
> if (!tmp_buf)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261014154301.157755-1-paul.cercueil@bootlin.com?part=3
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-14 15:42 [PATCH v3 0/7] spi: Add support for panic mem writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-14 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] spi: spi-mem: " Paul Cercueil
2026-10-14 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mtd: spi-nor: Wait for NOR ready with poll_timeout_us() Paul Cercueil
2026-10-14 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for panic writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-14 15:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-14 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Clear "SDMA ready" IRQ flag after polling Paul Cercueil
2026-10-14 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 15:42 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add irq-less support Paul Cercueil
2026-10-14 16:00 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add support for panic writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-14 16:03 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-14 15:43 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] spi: dt-bindings: cadence: Make XSPI's IRQ line optional Paul Cercueil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-171505@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.cercueil@bootlin.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=tanmay@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox