Linux-mtd Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paul Cercueil" <paul.cercueil@bootlin.com>,
	"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
	"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
	"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
	"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
	"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
	"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
	"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	"Bharat Bhushan" <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
	"Sunil Kovvuri Goutham" <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
	"Tanmay Jagdale" <tanmay@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add irq-less support
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:45:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-174200@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016102917.171095-6-paul.cercueil@bootlin.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: unbounded wait for completion on hardware interrupts
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: missing reinit_completion() causes completion state leak
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: shared IRQ handler steals status bits breaking polling
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: SDMA error ignored and uncleared in polling mode
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: 1ms poll timeout is too short for large transfers
--

commit fb747b04ad9d770849280630aa3b2694cba31fbe
Author: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@marvell.com>

spi: cadence-xspi: Add irq-less support

This patch makes the interrupt line optional. If an interrupt is not provided,
the driver will fall back to polling the controller registers for completion.

> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c
> index 095bf640b379a..2a2a40bf0a4c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c
> @@ -365,6 +365,38 @@ static int cdns_xspi_wait_for_controller_idle(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi)
>  					  100, 1000);
>  }
>  
> +static bool cdns_xspi_is_stig_ready(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi, bool sleep)
> +{
> +	u32 ctrl_stat;
> +
> +	return !readl_relaxed_poll_timeout
> +		(cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_CTRL_STATUS_REG,
> +		ctrl_stat,
> +		((ctrl_stat & BIT(3)) == 0),
> +		sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_DELAY_US : 0,
> +		sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_TIMEOUT_US : 0);
> +}

[Severity: High]
Is MRVL_XSPI_POLL_TIMEOUT_US (1ms) long enough for large transfers?

When irq < 0 or during a panic write, cdns_xspi_send_stig_command() uses
this function to poll. The driver allows transfers up to sdmasize (often
64KB), which can take ~21ms at 25MHz. The 1ms timeout will systematically
fail these larger transfers, causing hardware state corruption.

> +
> +static bool cdns_xspi_is_sdma_ready(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi, bool sleep)
> +{
> +	u32 ctrl_stat;
> +
> +	if (readl_relaxed_poll_timeout
> +	    (cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG,
> +	     ctrl_stat,
> +	     (ctrl_stat & CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_TRIGGER),
> +	     sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_DELAY_US : 0,
> +	     sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_TIMEOUT_US : 0)) {
> +		return false;
> +	}

[Severity: High]
If an SDMA transaction encounters an error while in polling mode,
will this loop ignore CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_ERROR?

If CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_ERROR is asserted alongside CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_TRIGGER, the
function returns true despite the error. If only the error is asserted,
it will wait the full timeout and return false, but it never clears the W1C
CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_ERROR bit, permanently wedging the DMA hardware state machine.

> +
> +	/* Clear the flag */
> +	writel(CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_TRIGGER,
> +	       cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG);

[Severity: High]
Could the shared IRQ handler steal the trigger bit from this polling loop?

In cdns_xspi_transfer_one_message_b0(), the driver performs normal SPI
transfers by polling cdns_xspi_is_sdma_ready(). If another device sharing
the same IRQ line fires an interrupt, cdns_xspi_irq_handler() will read
CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG and unconditionally write it back, clearing all
pending bits. This can cause the polling loop to time out and the transfer
to incorrectly fail with -EIO.

> +
> +	return true;
> +}

[ ... ]

> @@ -562,16 +595,25 @@ static int cdns_xspi_send_stig_command(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi,
>  
>  		cdns_xspi_trigger_command(cdns_xspi, cmd_regs);
>  
> -		wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->sdma_complete);
> -		if (cdns_xspi->sdma_error) {
> -			cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> +		if (cdns_xspi->irq >= 0) {
> +			wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->sdma_complete);

[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does the completion
state need to be reinitialized via reinit_completion() before the hardware
command is triggered?

If an error occurs or a spurious interrupt fires, cdns_xspi_irq_handler()
could call complete() multiple times for cdns_xspi->sdma_complete. Without
reinit_completion(), leftover completion tokens will cause subsequent
wait_for_completion() calls to return immediately while the hardware is
still transferring data, leading to memory and state corruption.

[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does this wait need a
timeout?

If the hardware fails to generate the interrupt, the calling thread will
hang indefinitely in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, creating a Denial of Service
condition.

> +			if (cdns_xspi->sdma_error) {
> +				cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> +				return -EIO;
> +			}
> +		} else if (!cdns_xspi_is_sdma_ready(cdns_xspi, true)) {
>  			return -EIO;
>  		}
> +
>  		cdns_xspi->sdma_handler(cdns_xspi);
>  	}
>  
> -	wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->cmd_complete);
> -	cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> +	if (cdns_xspi->irq >= 0) {
> +		wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->cmd_complete);

[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but should this wait also
have a timeout?

Just like with sdma_complete, if the hardware fails to generate the STIG
completion interrupt, the calling thread will hang indefinitely.

> +		cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> +	} else if (!cdns_xspi_is_stig_ready(cdns_xspi, true)) {
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
>  
>  	cmd_status = cdns_xspi_check_command_status(cdns_xspi);
>  	if (cmd_status)

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016102917.171095-1-paul.cercueil@bootlin.com?part=5

______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-16 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-16 10:29 [PATCH v4 0/7] spi: Add support for panic mem writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] spi: spi-mem: " Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] mtd: spi-nor: Wait for NOR ready with poll_timeout_us() Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for panic writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Clear "SDMA ready" IRQ flag after polling Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:42   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add irq-less support Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:45   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add support for panic writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:50   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] spi: dt-bindings: cadence: Make XSPI's IRQ line optional Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:39   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-174200@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.cercueil@bootlin.com \
    --cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
    --cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
    --cc=tanmay@marvell.com \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox