From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Paul Cercueil" <paul.cercueil@bootlin.com>,
"Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>,
"Mark Brown" <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: "Kees Cook" <kees@kernel.org>, "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"Guilherme G . Piccoli" <gpiccoli@igalia.com>,
"Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
"Bharat Bhushan" <bbhushan2@marvell.com>,
"Sunil Kovvuri Goutham" <sgoutham@marvell.com>,
"Tanmay Jagdale" <tanmay@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add irq-less support
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2026 10:45:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-174200@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261016102917.171095-6-paul.cercueil@bootlin.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 5 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: unbounded wait for completion on hardware interrupts
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: missing reinit_completion() causes completion state leak
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: shared IRQ handler steals status bits breaking polling
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: SDMA error ignored and uncleared in polling mode
- [High] spi: cadence-xspi: 1ms poll timeout is too short for large transfers
--
commit fb747b04ad9d770849280630aa3b2694cba31fbe
Author: Tanmay Jagdale <tanmay@marvell.com>
spi: cadence-xspi: Add irq-less support
This patch makes the interrupt line optional. If an interrupt is not provided,
the driver will fall back to polling the controller registers for completion.
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c
> index 095bf640b379a..2a2a40bf0a4c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-cadence-xspi.c
> @@ -365,6 +365,38 @@ static int cdns_xspi_wait_for_controller_idle(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi)
> 100, 1000);
> }
>
> +static bool cdns_xspi_is_stig_ready(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi, bool sleep)
> +{
> + u32 ctrl_stat;
> +
> + return !readl_relaxed_poll_timeout
> + (cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_CTRL_STATUS_REG,
> + ctrl_stat,
> + ((ctrl_stat & BIT(3)) == 0),
> + sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_DELAY_US : 0,
> + sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_TIMEOUT_US : 0);
> +}
[Severity: High]
Is MRVL_XSPI_POLL_TIMEOUT_US (1ms) long enough for large transfers?
When irq < 0 or during a panic write, cdns_xspi_send_stig_command() uses
this function to poll. The driver allows transfers up to sdmasize (often
64KB), which can take ~21ms at 25MHz. The 1ms timeout will systematically
fail these larger transfers, causing hardware state corruption.
> +
> +static bool cdns_xspi_is_sdma_ready(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi, bool sleep)
> +{
> + u32 ctrl_stat;
> +
> + if (readl_relaxed_poll_timeout
> + (cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG,
> + ctrl_stat,
> + (ctrl_stat & CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_TRIGGER),
> + sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_DELAY_US : 0,
> + sleep ? MRVL_XSPI_POLL_TIMEOUT_US : 0)) {
> + return false;
> + }
[Severity: High]
If an SDMA transaction encounters an error while in polling mode,
will this loop ignore CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_ERROR?
If CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_ERROR is asserted alongside CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_TRIGGER, the
function returns true despite the error. If only the error is asserted,
it will wait the full timeout and return false, but it never clears the W1C
CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_ERROR bit, permanently wedging the DMA hardware state machine.
> +
> + /* Clear the flag */
> + writel(CDNS_XSPI_SDMA_TRIGGER,
> + cdns_xspi->iobase + CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG);
[Severity: High]
Could the shared IRQ handler steal the trigger bit from this polling loop?
In cdns_xspi_transfer_one_message_b0(), the driver performs normal SPI
transfers by polling cdns_xspi_is_sdma_ready(). If another device sharing
the same IRQ line fires an interrupt, cdns_xspi_irq_handler() will read
CDNS_XSPI_INTR_STATUS_REG and unconditionally write it back, clearing all
pending bits. This can cause the polling loop to time out and the transfer
to incorrectly fail with -EIO.
> +
> + return true;
> +}
[ ... ]
> @@ -562,16 +595,25 @@ static int cdns_xspi_send_stig_command(struct cdns_xspi_dev *cdns_xspi,
>
> cdns_xspi_trigger_command(cdns_xspi, cmd_regs);
>
> - wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->sdma_complete);
> - if (cdns_xspi->sdma_error) {
> - cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> + if (cdns_xspi->irq >= 0) {
> + wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->sdma_complete);
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does the completion
state need to be reinitialized via reinit_completion() before the hardware
command is triggered?
If an error occurs or a spurious interrupt fires, cdns_xspi_irq_handler()
could call complete() multiple times for cdns_xspi->sdma_complete. Without
reinit_completion(), leftover completion tokens will cause subsequent
wait_for_completion() calls to return immediately while the hardware is
still transferring data, leading to memory and state corruption.
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but does this wait need a
timeout?
If the hardware fails to generate the interrupt, the calling thread will
hang indefinitely in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE, creating a Denial of Service
condition.
> + if (cdns_xspi->sdma_error) {
> + cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> + return -EIO;
> + }
> + } else if (!cdns_xspi_is_sdma_ready(cdns_xspi, true)) {
> return -EIO;
> }
> +
> cdns_xspi->sdma_handler(cdns_xspi);
> }
>
> - wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->cmd_complete);
> - cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> + if (cdns_xspi->irq >= 0) {
> + wait_for_completion(&cdns_xspi->cmd_complete);
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but should this wait also
have a timeout?
Just like with sdma_complete, if the hardware fails to generate the STIG
completion interrupt, the calling thread will hang indefinitely.
> + cdns_xspi->set_interrupts_handler(cdns_xspi, false);
> + } else if (!cdns_xspi_is_stig_ready(cdns_xspi, true)) {
> + return -EIO;
> + }
>
> cmd_status = cdns_xspi_check_command_status(cdns_xspi);
> if (cmd_status)
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261016102917.171095-1-paul.cercueil@bootlin.com?part=5
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-16 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-16 10:29 [PATCH v4 0/7] spi: Add support for panic mem writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] spi: spi-mem: " Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] mtd: spi-nor: Wait for NOR ready with poll_timeout_us() Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] mtd: spi-nor: Add support for panic writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Clear "SDMA ready" IRQ flag after polling Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add irq-less support Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:45 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] spi: cadence-xspi: Add support for panic writes Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:50 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-16 10:29 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] spi: dt-bindings: cadence: Make XSPI's IRQ line optional Paul Cercueil
2026-10-16 10:39 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-174200@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bbhushan2@marvell.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gpiccoli@igalia.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.cercueil@bootlin.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sgoutham@marvell.com \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=tanmay@marvell.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox