From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: haibo.chen@oss.nxp.com, "Pratyush Yadav" <pratyush@kernel.org>,
"Michael Walle" <mwalle@kernel.org>,
"Takahiro Kuwano" <takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com>,
"Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>,
"Richard Weinberger" <richard@nod.at>,
"Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
michael@walle.cc, "Haibo Chen" <haibo.chen@nxp.com>,
Frank.Li@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mtd: spi-nor: clear the default read_sr2 opcode for xSPI Profile 1.0 flashes
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2026 08:20:36 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-181158@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261022-spi-nor-fix-v3-1-bffa00b75c27@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] mtd: spi-nor: read_sr2 left set for 8D-8D-8D flashes without Profile 1.0
--
commit ef4079e3aea2014890e08df31ea4d8775a392f81
Author: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@nxp.com>
mtd: spi-nor: clear the default read_sr2 opcode for xSPI Profile 1.0 flashes
This commit clears params->opcodes.read_sr2 in spi_nor_parse_profile1() so
that flashes with an xspi profile 1.0 table do not issue an unsupported
0x35 register read when running in octal dtr mode.
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> index 4a3f82e97cef8..722eeff71d0df 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c
> @@ -1344,6 +1344,17 @@ static int spi_nor_parse_profile1(struct spi_nor *nor,
> */
> nor->params->hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_8_8_8_DTR;
>
> + /*
> + * The xSPI Profile 1.0 table does not describe a Read Configuration
> + * Register (RDCR, 35h) instruction, and the single-byte RDCR default
> + * is not usable in 8D-8D-8D mode. Drop the SR2 read opcode for these
> + * octal-capable flashes so spi_nor_read_sr1_and_sr2() degrades to an
> + * SR1-only read and spi_nor_init() does not issue an unsupported
> + * command that the flash never answers. A manufacturer driver that
> + * actually needs SR2 can install its own opcode in a later fixup.
> + */
> + nor->params->opcodes.read_sr2 = 0;
[Severity: Medium]
What happens on octal dtr flashes that do not publish an xspi profile 1.0
table, so spi_nor_parse_profile1() is never called?
Specifically, some batches of the Micron mt35xu512aba lack the profile 1.0
table and instead configure SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR in
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/micron-st.c:mt35xu512aba_post_sfdp_fixup():
nor->params->hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_8_8_8_DTR;
spi_nor_set_read_settings(&nor->params->reads[SNOR_CMD_READ_8_8_8_DTR],
0, 20, SPINOR_OP_MT_DTR_RD,
SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
...
nor->params->hwcaps.mask |= SNOR_HWCAPS_PP_8_8_8_DTR;
spi_nor_set_pp_settings(&nor->params->page_programs[SNOR_CMD_PP_8_8_8_DTR],
SPINOR_OP_PP_4B, SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR);
In drivers/mtd/spi-nor/sfdp.c:spi_nor_parse_bfpt(), params->opcodes.read_sr2
is initialized to SPINOR_OP_RDCR (0x35) and remains set when the quad enable
requirements field contains a reserved value (which
mt35xu512aba_post_sfdp_fixup() notes is the case on this part) or
BFPT_DWORD15_QER_NONE:
params->opcodes.read_sr1 = SPINOR_OP_RDSR;
params->opcodes.read_sr2 = SPINOR_OP_RDCR;
...
default:
dev_dbg(nor->dev, "BFPT QER reserved value used\n");
break;
Similarly, non-sfdp flashes initialized with SPI_NOR_OCTAL_DTR_READ in
drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c:spi_nor_no_sfdp_init_params() enable
SNOR_HWCAPS_READ_8_8_8_DTR while leaving params->opcodes.read_sr2 set to
SPINOR_OP_RDCR from spi_nor_init_default_params().
When spi_nor_init() switches these flashes to SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR via
spi_nor_set_octal_dtr() and then runs:
spi_nor_init()
-> spi_nor_cache_sr_lock_bits()
-> spi_nor_read_sr1_and_sr2_careful()
-> spi_nor_read_sr2_careful()
-> spi_nor_read_sr_ll()
wouldn't this still issue the unsupported 0x3535 register read in
SNOR_PROTO_8_8_8_DTR mode and fail probe or resume with a controller
timeout?
> +
> out:
> kfree(dwords);
> return ret;
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261022-spi-nor-fix-v3-1-bffa00b75c27@nxp.com?part=1
______________________________________________________
Linux MTD discussion mailing list
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mtd/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-22 8:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-22 8:07 [PATCH v3] mtd: spi-nor: clear the default read_sr2 opcode for xSPI Profile 1.0 flashes haibo.chen
2026-10-22 8:20 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-22 8:56 ` Bough Chen (OSS)
2026-10-22 9:52 ` Miquel Raynal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-181158@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=haibo.chen@nxp.com \
--cc=haibo.chen@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
--cc=mwalle@kernel.org \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=takahiro.kuwano@infineon.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox